<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title>VentureBeat - Latest Comments in 20 worst VC investments of all time</title><link>http://venturebeat.disqus.com/</link><description>News about Tech, Business and Innovation</description><atom:link href="https://venturebeat.disqus.com/20_worst_vc_investments_of_all_time/latest.rss" rel="self"></atom:link><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Tue, 07 Jul 2009 05:57:03 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: 20 worst VC investments of all time</title><link>http://venturebeat.com/2007/11/19/20-worst-vc-investments-of-all-time/#comment-12245418</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Nice thought..&lt;br&gt;Eileen&lt;br&gt;==================&lt;br&gt;&lt;a href="http://auctions.fastrealestate.net" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="http://auctions.fastrealestate.net"&gt;&lt;br&gt;foreclosure auctions&lt;/a&gt; &lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Barbara Brown</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 07 Jul 2009 05:57:03 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: 20 worst VC investments of all time</title><link>http://venturebeat.com/2007/11/19/20-worst-vc-investments-of-all-time/#comment-14680669</link><description>&lt;p&gt;PowerAgent, and less for the sheer $ raised but instead for the intensity and velocity of the flameout: huge PR hype packed into an incredibly short timeframe ... black star-like in its density and smallness. Vapor at its best. Not even listed on Carlick's LinkedIn profile!&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">dbiz</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 30 Nov 2007 01:43:03 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: 20 worst VC investments of all time</title><link>http://venturebeat.com/2007/11/19/20-worst-vc-investments-of-all-time/#comment-14680668</link><description>&lt;p&gt;General Magic :)?&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">RJ</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 29 Nov 2007 16:13:21 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: 20 worst VC investments of all time</title><link>http://venturebeat.com/2007/11/19/20-worst-vc-investments-of-all-time/#comment-14680667</link><description>&lt;p&gt;This dates me a bit - it far precedes the net mania, but Amdahl's Trilogy Systems ~1984 had accumulated ~$250m in investor funding and closed due to wafer yield problems and heat dissipation?, but mostly due to low yield from a nickel based wiring interconnect metallurgy - cracking and delaminating.... I only saw the prospectus from a distance....&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;I am guessing ~$250m in 1984 dollars is considerably more in circa 2000 dollars of most of the net firms cited...&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Mark Wendman</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 21 Nov 2007 01:38:45 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: 20 worst VC investments of all time</title><link>http://venturebeat.com/2007/11/19/20-worst-vc-investments-of-all-time/#comment-14680666</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Matt, yes, you may be right.  I am really only certain about Highland's investment, because I was in VC at the time in Boston, and our Monday meeting after that investment was announced, the firm I was at - which generally competed with Highland -- stopped investing in anything with the word "Internet" in it because the valuations were getting crazy and the business models didn't seem to work. That was 1996.  :-)  We had looked at the eToys deal and declined because, specifically, their cost of customer acquisition was $107 and the lifetime projected profit was about $10.  I was in my mid twenties at the time, and I remember following that deal and learning that these bubbles go longer than you think, and if you get in early enough, you can get out a make a lot of money.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">James Currier</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 20 Nov 2007 23:26:34 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: 20 worst VC investments of all time</title><link>http://venturebeat.com/2007/11/19/20-worst-vc-investments-of-all-time/#comment-14680665</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Quokka Sports was yet another truly spectacular flameout.  One of the most memorable moments of the dot-bust was walking through their office space during the viewing before the bankruptcy auction.  It was a veritable temple of overspending.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;The problem with a list like this is that 20 isn't nearly enough.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Patti</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 20 Nov 2007 15:45:33 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: 20 worst VC investments of all time</title><link>http://venturebeat.com/2007/11/19/20-worst-vc-investments-of-all-time/#comment-14680664</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Would be interesting to see this list with list of funding rounds, (estimated) valuations and participants over time.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">leec</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 20 Nov 2007 15:18:43 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: 20 worst VC investments of all time</title><link>http://venturebeat.com/2007/11/19/20-worst-vc-investments-of-all-time/#comment-14680663</link><description>&lt;p&gt;There are plenty of good life-science examples beyond Xoma. One that just crossed my transom is Vascular Architects, a medical-device firm that raised more than $42 million and just &lt;a href="http://venturebeat.com/2007/09/21/vascular-architects-sold-for-a-pittance/" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="http://venturebeat.com/2007/09/21/vascular-architects-sold-for-a-pittance/"&gt;sold itself for $2.8 million&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">David Hamilton</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 20 Nov 2007 15:11:06 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: 20 worst VC investments of all time</title><link>http://venturebeat.com/2007/11/19/20-worst-vc-investments-of-all-time/#comment-14680662</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Thanks Mark, will note that. That seemed to be the weakest link on the list anyway.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Matt Marshall</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 20 Nov 2007 14:04:05 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: 20 worst VC investments of all time</title><link>http://venturebeat.com/2007/11/19/20-worst-vc-investments-of-all-time/#comment-14680661</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Candescent should be on the list they went through over 200mm before the internet bubble.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Bob</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 20 Nov 2007 13:37:11 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: 20 worst VC investments of all time</title><link>http://venturebeat.com/2007/11/19/20-worst-vc-investments-of-all-time/#comment-14680660</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Information on at least one of these companies is incorrect and outdated.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;XOMA turned a profit in Q3 of this year&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Mark P.</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 20 Nov 2007 13:22:56 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: 20 worst VC investments of all time</title><link>http://venturebeat.com/2007/11/19/20-worst-vc-investments-of-all-time/#comment-14680659</link><description>&lt;p&gt;It shows how visionary most of the VCs are!&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">founder</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 20 Nov 2007 13:13:53 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: 20 worst VC investments of all time</title><link>http://venturebeat.com/2007/11/19/20-worst-vc-investments-of-all-time/#comment-14680658</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Where is F*cked company these days? And where is Pud's ad network?&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Jin</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 20 Nov 2007 12:01:44 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: 20 worst VC investments of all time</title><link>http://venturebeat.com/2007/11/19/20-worst-vc-investments-of-all-time/#comment-14680657</link><description>&lt;p&gt;What about Pluris?  Had to have gone thru $150 million...did a $100 million Series D round.  Not as bad as Caspian and Procket...glad we passed on those :)&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">recoveringvc</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 20 Nov 2007 11:17:26 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: 20 worst VC investments of all time</title><link>http://venturebeat.com/2007/11/19/20-worst-vc-investments-of-all-time/#comment-14680656</link><description>&lt;p&gt;"eToys was actually a great investment for venture firms like Highland and Sequoia. They got in and got out before the bust came and made $100’s of millions."&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;I can tell you for a fact that Highland lost all of the money it invested in eToys.  They rode it all the way up and all the way back down.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;So many memories... Calient, Asera, Photuris, Brience, Corvis, StorageNetworks, Cierra Photonics, CoreExpress, Ensemble Communications.  And we haven't even listed any CLECs yet!&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ArgleBargle</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 20 Nov 2007 11:12:23 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: 20 worst VC investments of all time</title><link>http://venturebeat.com/2007/11/19/20-worst-vc-investments-of-all-time/#comment-14680655</link><description>&lt;p&gt;James, are you sure about Sequoia. I recall they came in very late on eToys -- right before it went public -- and with lock-up they may not have gotten out before it crumbled. I don't know, but would prefer to be certain before updating.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Matt Marshall</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 20 Nov 2007 11:02:20 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: 20 worst VC investments of all time</title><link>http://venturebeat.com/2007/11/19/20-worst-vc-investments-of-all-time/#comment-14680654</link><description>&lt;p&gt;That top 20 covers most of the greatest hits of the era, but there were other notable flame-outs.  Don't forget the $35 million bomb called &lt;a href="http://Greatentertaining.com" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="Greatentertaining.com"&gt;Greatentertaining.com&lt;/a&gt;. Who would have thought that the world would not go crazy over themed party supplies?  (If only there was a place today to overpay for Hannah Montana party cups!)  Classic case of a bad idea poorly executed, and backed by blue-chip firm Benchmark among others.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Miles Mellough</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 20 Nov 2007 10:35:49 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: 20 worst VC investments of all time</title><link>http://venturebeat.com/2007/11/19/20-worst-vc-investments-of-all-time/#comment-14680653</link><description>&lt;p&gt;If only this were accurate.  Unfortunately, there are countless other flameouts out there that took tens of millions (or more) of dollars in financing and then crashed before a liquidity event.  I have been keeping a list for sometime, maybe I'll toss them up on the blog soon.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Deva Hazarika</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 20 Nov 2007 04:11:51 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: 20 worst VC investments of all time</title><link>http://venturebeat.com/2007/11/19/20-worst-vc-investments-of-all-time/#comment-14680652</link><description>&lt;p&gt;What about OmniSky?  $240M in private and public funding, then bankrupt, assets sold in firesale to EarthLink.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">tom</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 20 Nov 2007 02:03:49 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: 20 worst VC investments of all time</title><link>http://venturebeat.com/2007/11/19/20-worst-vc-investments-of-all-time/#comment-14680651</link><description>&lt;p&gt;eToys was actually a great investment for venture firms like Highland and Sequoia.  They got in and got out before the bust came and made $100's of millions.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">James Currier</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 20 Nov 2007 01:03:20 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: 20 worst VC investments of all time</title><link>http://venturebeat.com/2007/11/19/20-worst-vc-investments-of-all-time/#comment-14680650</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Who every came up with this list did a great job. All the main players are listed here. The fact that Procket, Alladvantage and Boo are all listed just shows how good the list is.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Jason</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 19 Nov 2007 23:45:23 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>