<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title>VentureBeat - Latest Comments in Alien&amp;#8217;s IPO: Close encounters of the scary kind</title><link>http://venturebeat.disqus.com/</link><description>News about Tech, Business and Innovation</description><atom:link href="https://venturebeat.disqus.com/alien8217s_ipo_close_encounters_of_the_scary_kind/latest.rss" rel="self"></atom:link><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Mon, 24 Apr 2006 08:01:14 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: Alien&amp;#8217;s IPO: Close encounters of the scary kind</title><link>http://venturebeat.com/2006/04/24/aliens-ipo-close-encounters-of-the-scary-kind/#comment-14665869</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Hi,&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Not surprised EPC passive Tag world, is an bad business model for startup,&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;In short issues curently Alien is faced with are:&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Low volume of tags sale on per customer basis, also per tag costs an customer 5 cents in 2010 now about 25 cents vs. 22 cents to make one currently.&lt;br&gt;  Competiting with well established players such as TI, Philips and other who own fabs, and able to use this product as an filler product. When they are not running DSP's...&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;I can see VC's wanting to unload this one, and collect.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;RK!&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">RK</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 24 Apr 2006 08:01:14 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>