<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title>VentureBeat - Latest Comments in Associated Content&amp;#8217;s bold media strategy &amp;#8212; relying on Google</title><link>http://venturebeat.disqus.com/</link><description>News about Tech, Business and Innovation</description><atom:link href="https://venturebeat.disqus.com/associated_content8217s_bold_media_strategy_8212_relying_on_google/latest.rss" rel="self"></atom:link><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Sat, 13 Oct 2007 00:32:10 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: Associated Content&amp;#8217;s bold media strategy &amp;#8212; relying on Google</title><link>http://venturebeat.com/2007/08/01/associated-contents-bold-media-strategy-relying-on-google/#comment-14677190</link><description>&lt;p&gt;For a college educated person, who has always wanted to write, and was pretty good at it, but didn't have the availibity, AC is perfect. I have been writing for three months, merely writing two articles five days a week, and already have earned  a lot of money. The pay has ranged from $3 to $7.00 per article. The longer I am there and the more readers, it seems the more i get paid. As with any career, you hvae to pay your dues first. I also  have received a small monthly bonus for page hits, only 20 a month, but not bad for just playing around. What would happen if I got serious? I advise AC for anyone wanting to being a writing career.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Dahloan</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 13 Oct 2007 00:32:10 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Associated Content&amp;#8217;s bold media strategy &amp;#8212; relying on Google</title><link>http://venturebeat.com/2007/08/01/associated-contents-bold-media-strategy-relying-on-google/#comment-14677189</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Associated Content pays people to write articles though, the content producers can be anyone.  I wouldn't say that the articles are plagiarized then again I wouldn't say that the articles are written by only specialists.  It is good work for a stay at home mom.  Usually pay is around $3.00 per 400 or more worded article.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Myth Buster</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 25 Sep 2007 14:38:57 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Associated Content&amp;#8217;s bold media strategy &amp;#8212; relying on Google</title><link>http://venturebeat.com/2007/08/01/associated-contents-bold-media-strategy-relying-on-google/#comment-14677188</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Associated content is pure spam and should get slapped like squidoo.  Nothing original or engaging about this site, just re-purposed articles lifted from other sources.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">b s meter</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 02 Aug 2007 21:47:26 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Associated Content&amp;#8217;s bold media strategy &amp;#8212; relying on Google</title><link>http://venturebeat.com/2007/08/01/associated-contents-bold-media-strategy-relying-on-google/#comment-14677187</link><description>&lt;p&gt;"bait the main search engines like Google" is an invitation to destruction by El Goog.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Stephen Larson</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 01 Aug 2007 22:00:57 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>