<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title>VentureBeat - Latest Comments in Baby boomer social network TeeBeeDee implodes</title><link>http://venturebeat.disqus.com/</link><description>News about Tech, Business and Innovation</description><atom:link href="https://venturebeat.disqus.com/baby_boomer_social_network_teebeedee_implodes/latest.rss" rel="self"></atom:link><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Jul 2009 10:50:06 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: Baby boomer social network TeeBeeDee implodes</title><link>http://venturebeat.com/2009/07/06/baby-boomer-social-network-teebeedee-implodes/#comment-12446028</link><description>&lt;p&gt;From my book Advertising to Baby Boomers, 2005/2007:&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Web pundits are drooling over social networking sites.While this business&lt;br&gt;model is successful and will continue to be, I’m not convinced&lt;br&gt;that people over fifty really care about la-de-da virtual socializing.There&lt;br&gt;has to be a reason to join and hang out other than simply being a&lt;br&gt;Baby Boomer. Sites that center around specific interests like gardening,&lt;br&gt;politics, health, travel, dating, food, art, sports, real estate, education,&lt;br&gt;grandparenting, volunteering, mentoring, etc. will attract a 50+&lt;br&gt;base. But few want or need to simply hop online and proclaim,“Hello!&lt;br&gt;I’m Joe and I’m a Baby Boomer!”&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Chuck_Nyren</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 10 Jul 2009 10:50:06 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Baby boomer social network TeeBeeDee implodes</title><link>http://venturebeat.com/2009/07/06/baby-boomer-social-network-teebeedee-implodes/#comment-12219571</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Camille and Robin you may or may not know that a baby-boomer is 50+, not 40+.  And baby-boomers are not as tech savvy, or tech willing as other demographics, so they tend to stay with what they are familiar.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Most of all, and most unfortunately, advertisers do see the value of advertising to their only loyal demographic, half of whom are seniors, the 65+.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Also, no one in their 40's wants to be called a "boomer".  It's not their generation.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;I know, I've been Editor-In-Chief for the longest on-line magazine for the mature market.  &lt;a href="http://seniorcitizensmagazine.com" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="seniorcitizensmagazine.com"&gt;seniorcitizensmagazine.com&lt;/a&gt; and we syndicate to the boomer audience.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Norman &lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Norman Goodman</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 06 Jul 2009 16:34:27 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Baby boomer social network TeeBeeDee implodes</title><link>http://venturebeat.com/2009/07/06/baby-boomer-social-network-teebeedee-implodes/#comment-12216433</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Uh...Camille...Robin is a she.  Might want to do a little fact-checking before assuming next time.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">JB</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 06 Jul 2009 15:52:46 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Baby boomer social network TeeBeeDee implodes</title><link>http://venturebeat.com/2009/07/06/baby-boomer-social-network-teebeedee-implodes/#comment-12204513</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I understand the thinking behind trying to corner the over 40 niche, but I don't understand why someone would go to TBD over a facebook or a twitter? &lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Alec Stolz</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 06 Jul 2009 13:33:54 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>