<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title>VentureBeat - Latest Comments in Buzznet, yet another social network, raises $6 million</title><link>http://venturebeat.disqus.com/</link><description>News about Tech, Business and Innovation</description><atom:link href="https://venturebeat.disqus.com/buzznet_yet_another_social_network_raises_6_million/latest.rss" rel="self"></atom:link><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Thu, 24 May 2007 12:09:00 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: Buzznet, yet another social network, raises $6 million</title><link>http://venturebeat.com/2007/05/24/buzznet-yet-another-social-network-raises-6-million/#comment-14675422</link><description>&lt;p&gt;&amp;gt;However, looking at the site, we don’t&lt;br&gt;&amp;gt;understand why. From the front page on, it’s &lt;br&gt;&amp;gt;chaos, with flashing banner ads on the right&lt;br&gt;&amp;gt;and shifting photographs on the left. The&lt;br&gt;&amp;gt;further down into the site you dig, the more&lt;br&gt;&amp;gt;chaotic it becomes. Profile pages are packed &lt;br&gt;&amp;gt;with inelegantly placed photos and videos, and&lt;br&gt;&amp;gt;a band’s bio is squeezed into a little&lt;br&gt;&amp;gt;scrollable text box.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Sounds like exactly what we used to say about MySpace.  I didn't believe that service would succeed either given the chaos of those users' pages, but was proved wrong.  Perhaps we should chock this up to L.A. social networking chic since they're both fm down there :)&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">P-Air</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 24 May 2007 12:09:00 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>