<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title>VentureBeat - Latest Comments in Chevron follows the money, bats down climate bill</title><link>http://venturebeat.disqus.com/</link><description>News about Tech, Business and Innovation</description><atom:link href="https://venturebeat.disqus.com/chevron_follows_the_money_bats_down_climate_bill/latest.rss" rel="self"></atom:link><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Tue, 01 Dec 2009 14:41:21 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: Chevron follows the money, bats down climate bill</title><link>http://green.venturebeat.com/2009/10/27/chevron-follows-the-money-bats-down-climate-bill/#comment-24455624</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I agree that greenwashing, especially stuff that is this blatant, is really horrible and the fact that they can even get away with it is amazing.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;However, it seems like some perspective has been lost on the greenwashing debate. Don't you think that greenwashing is part of the process? The problem with the word 'green' right now is that there is no definition, by uncovering companies that are greenwashing, a definition will gradually emerge. I cited this article in a post on The Green Light Distrikt about the subject. I'd be interested to hear your feedback! &lt;a href="http://tiny.cc/Vd5bl" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="http://tiny.cc/Vd5bl"&gt;http://tiny.cc/Vd5bl&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Cheers,&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Chris&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Chris Williams</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 01 Dec 2009 14:41:21 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Chevron follows the money, bats down climate bill</title><link>http://green.venturebeat.com/2009/10/27/chevron-follows-the-money-bats-down-climate-bill/#comment-21189105</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Eh, note his problem with the bill. It's not the bill itself, but the timing. His argument is that this might damage whatever tenuous recovery we might have, something that could be crucial to conservational investments in the future.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;I can respect that position. I disagree with it, but I respect it. It's not saying global warming isn't real; it's saying that the current economic problems factor into the debate.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">drew</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 28 Oct 2009 13:09:20 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Chevron follows the money, bats down climate bill</title><link>http://green.venturebeat.com/2009/10/27/chevron-follows-the-money-bats-down-climate-bill/#comment-21184751</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Chevron's green wash is just window dressing.  Do people pretend to be green and work hard for the old carbon technologies?  People Do.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">mjmalloy</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 28 Oct 2009 12:16:12 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>