<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title>VentureBeat - Latest Comments in Chrome 2 browser runs Web 2.0 30 percent faster</title><link>http://venturebeat.disqus.com/</link><description>News about Tech, Business and Innovation</description><atom:link href="https://venturebeat.disqus.com/chrome_2_browser_runs_web_20_30_percent_faster/latest.rss" rel="self"></atom:link><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Mon, 21 Dec 2009 02:18:18 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: Chrome 2 browser runs Web 2.0 30 percent faster</title><link>http://venturebeat.com/2009/05/22/chrome-2-browser-runs-web-20-30-percent-faster/#comment-26760905</link><description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;br&gt;I really appreciate your help, it is very useful for me,you will get good grades!&lt;br&gt;You will be successful. &lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">James Garvey</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 21 Dec 2009 02:18:18 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Chrome 2 browser runs Web 2.0 30 percent faster</title><link>http://venturebeat.com/2009/05/22/chrome-2-browser-runs-web-20-30-percent-faster/#comment-10538833</link><description>&lt;p&gt;The chrome speed dial is very cool, but &lt;a href="http://sthrt.com" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="sthrt.com"&gt;sthrt.com&lt;/a&gt; is speed dial on steroids.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">mattmcb</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 05 Jun 2009 18:15:13 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Chrome 2 browser runs Web 2.0 30 percent faster</title><link>http://venturebeat.com/2009/05/22/chrome-2-browser-runs-web-20-30-percent-faster/#comment-10307564</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I've had a different experience with chrome 2. Chrome 1 was fast, Chrome 2 feels like Safari 1.&lt;br&gt;It's slow and clunky even with 4 tabs let alone my usual 8. Firefox is kicking chrome's butt on my old athlon.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">enzogames</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 30 May 2009 22:23:26 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Chrome 2 browser runs Web 2.0 30 percent faster</title><link>http://venturebeat.com/2009/05/22/chrome-2-browser-runs-web-20-30-percent-faster/#comment-9832866</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I've been a fan of Chrome since the start. I see these tests talking of its speed all over the place, but in every day browsing I'm no longer finding Chrome faster ,or as fast as the opposition. My default is now Opera 10 alpha, and if that should fail it would be back to Firefox beta. When a new Chrome arrives I'll download and try it, and every time it now disappoints, and that's a shame.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Denver</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 23 May 2009 13:29:41 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Chrome 2 browser runs Web 2.0 30 percent faster</title><link>http://venturebeat.com/2009/05/22/chrome-2-browser-runs-web-20-30-percent-faster/#comment-9806075</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Yes, that should have been a comma.  Damn.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">rush</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 22 May 2009 16:00:31 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Chrome 2 browser runs Web 2.0 30 percent faster</title><link>http://venturebeat.com/2009/05/22/chrome-2-browser-runs-web-20-30-percent-faster/#comment-9806049</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Typo in your comment.  I think you meant. "third sentence."&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">rush</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 22 May 2009 15:59:43 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Chrome 2 browser runs Web 2.0 30 percent faster</title><link>http://venturebeat.com/2009/05/22/chrome-2-browser-runs-web-20-30-percent-faster/#comment-9805445</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I'm with you Craig.  Specifically I'd be excited to see the New Tab King (&lt;a href="http://www.newtabking.com" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="http://www.newtabking.com"&gt;http://www.newtabking.com&lt;/a&gt;) extension baked into this great piece of Chrome&lt;br&gt;--shelly&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">shelly</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 22 May 2009 15:40:09 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Chrome 2 browser runs Web 2.0 30 percent faster</title><link>http://venturebeat.com/2009/05/22/chrome-2-browser-runs-web-20-30-percent-faster/#comment-9803440</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Our site is a good example of a site where you can see a big difference.  We have A LOT of javascript and some animations is javascript and the difference between chrome and firefox is very significant.  I really hope (for our sake) that when firefox 3.5 come out it can keep up with chrome.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="http://flotate.com" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="http://flotate.com"&gt;http://flotate.com&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;-Ryan&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Ryan</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 22 May 2009 15:02:36 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Chrome 2 browser runs Web 2.0 30 percent faster</title><link>http://venturebeat.com/2009/05/22/chrome-2-browser-runs-web-20-30-percent-faster/#comment-9801660</link><description>&lt;p&gt;If the new version is 30% faster than the old version, that still tells us nothing how this is compared to other browsers. Pretty useless article considering that all it does are statements of truthiness.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">IamMe</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 22 May 2009 14:05:30 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Chrome 2 browser runs Web 2.0 30 percent faster</title><link>http://venturebeat.com/2009/05/22/chrome-2-browser-runs-web-20-30-percent-faster/#comment-9801326</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I love Chrome, without a doubt it makes Gmail a hundred times better of an experience.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Yasser</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 22 May 2009 13:53:19 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Chrome 2 browser runs Web 2.0 30 percent faster</title><link>http://venturebeat.com/2009/05/22/chrome-2-browser-runs-web-20-30-percent-faster/#comment-9801156</link><description>&lt;p&gt;If they could make Chrome use Firefox Extensions (Add-ons) then I would use it. I like Firefox because I can add extensions that perform various tasks I want done, and customize the browser to my tastes.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Craig</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 22 May 2009 13:48:08 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Chrome 2 browser runs Web 2.0 30 percent faster</title><link>http://venturebeat.com/2009/05/22/chrome-2-browser-runs-web-20-30-percent-faster/#comment-9801028</link><description>&lt;p&gt;web 2.0 is dead and they have skipped right to web 4.0.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ryan</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 22 May 2009 13:44:16 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Chrome 2 browser runs Web 2.0 30 percent faster</title><link>http://venturebeat.com/2009/05/22/chrome-2-browser-runs-web-20-30-percent-faster/#comment-9799651</link><description>&lt;p&gt;The add-on is probably for users that are use to the old windows3.1 where the sub-directory is written in C++ all throughout the 500 cm lenght......&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;when you covert this to points on a scale the feature remains the same.........&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;this is just the gloss that the magazine needs for it to penetrate a harder market from within......&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;salil ghoshal.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Salil Ghoshal</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 22 May 2009 13:03:34 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Chrome 2 browser runs Web 2.0 30 percent faster</title><link>http://venturebeat.com/2009/05/22/chrome-2-browser-runs-web-20-30-percent-faster/#comment-9799615</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Typo in second sentence:  I think you mean "rewRites."&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Editor in Chief</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 22 May 2009 13:01:47 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Chrome 2 browser runs Web 2.0 30 percent faster</title><link>http://venturebeat.com/2009/05/22/chrome-2-browser-runs-web-20-30-percent-faster/#comment-9799216</link><description>&lt;p&gt;How come no one is mentioning that the zoom function now zooms the entire page rather than just the text. That is a crazy welcome addition!&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Logan</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 22 May 2009 12:47:47 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Chrome 2 browser runs Web 2.0 30 percent faster</title><link>http://venturebeat.com/2009/05/22/chrome-2-browser-runs-web-20-30-percent-faster/#comment-9799139</link><description>&lt;p&gt;You know what browser I tried that was pretty darn fast? The PC version of Safari. Firefox is still my preference though.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Screen Sleuth</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 22 May 2009 12:44:31 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Chrome 2 browser runs Web 2.0 30 percent faster</title><link>http://venturebeat.com/2009/05/22/chrome-2-browser-runs-web-20-30-percent-faster/#comment-9798933</link><description>&lt;p&gt;when one tab loads, the other ones don't work&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Vladimir</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 22 May 2009 12:37:55 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>