<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title>VentureBeat - Latest Comments in Danger, and its IPO</title><link>http://venturebeat.disqus.com/</link><description>News about Tech, Business and Innovation</description><atom:link href="https://venturebeat.disqus.com/danger_and_its_ipo/latest.rss" rel="self"></atom:link><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Fri, 24 Nov 2006 14:04:08 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: Danger, and its IPO</title><link>http://venturebeat.com/2006/11/21/danger-and-its-ipo/#comment-14670432</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Scott, sorry, I forgot the  ending to the line I struck, and so erroneously cut the rest of the post. I've restored it. Thanks.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Matt Marshall</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 24 Nov 2006 14:04:08 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Danger, and its IPO</title><link>http://venturebeat.com/2006/11/21/danger-and-its-ipo/#comment-14670431</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Why get rid of the Berggi snarkiness and the Danger differentiation comment. Were they incorrect somehow?&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Scott Rafer</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 22 Nov 2006 20:11:40 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>