<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title>VentureBeat - Latest Comments in Demand Media raises $120 million for a bunch of shell Websites</title><link>http://venturebeat.disqus.com/</link><description>News about Tech, Business and Innovation</description><atom:link href="https://venturebeat.disqus.com/demand_media_raises_120_million_for_a_bunch_of_shell_websites/latest.rss" rel="self"></atom:link><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Wed, 03 May 2006 08:22:35 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: Demand Media raises $120 million for a bunch of shell Websites</title><link>http://venturebeat.com/2006/05/02/demand-media-raises-120-million-for-a-bunch-of-shell-websites/#comment-14665916</link><description>&lt;p&gt;There's got to be more to it. Otherwise . . . well, he did OK with MySpace.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Ed Delia</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 03 May 2006 08:22:35 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Demand Media raises $120 million for a bunch of shell Websites</title><link>http://venturebeat.com/2006/05/02/demand-media-raises-120-million-for-a-bunch-of-shell-websites/#comment-14665915</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Lots of people do this (w/o $120MM I might add); the search engines usually consider them spammers, and block the sites when they find them.  The prospects for this venture look severely limited if Yahoo!, Google and MSN kick these pages out of their search engines.  When I was at Yahoo! we took a very dim view of a site that posted no unique content and just tried to use duplicate content (RSS news feeds, etc.) as an excuse to show ads (and no special treatment if they were Yahoo!'s Overture ads).&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Jon</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 03 May 2006 06:45:25 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Demand Media raises $120 million for a bunch of shell Websites</title><link>http://venturebeat.com/2006/05/02/demand-media-raises-120-million-for-a-bunch-of-shell-websites/#comment-14665914</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Sounds like the Seinfeld of Web 2.0 - a website about nothing.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">leec</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 03 May 2006 06:27:33 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Demand Media raises $120 million for a bunch of shell Websites</title><link>http://venturebeat.com/2006/05/02/demand-media-raises-120-million-for-a-bunch-of-shell-websites/#comment-14665913</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Makes perfect sense if you understand that the parked domain business is 10% of Google's business.  AdSense in parked domains is Googles quiet cash cow.  Yahoo does the same type of feeds.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Common Sense</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 02 May 2006 13:55:32 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Demand Media raises $120 million for a bunch of shell Websites</title><link>http://venturebeat.com/2006/05/02/demand-media-raises-120-million-for-a-bunch-of-shell-websites/#comment-14665912</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I'm at a loss too. Especially when there are other companies out there already doing similar things.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Advertising bubble in full stretch?&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Matt Marshall</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 02 May 2006 13:15:48 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Demand Media raises $120 million for a bunch of shell Websites</title><link>http://venturebeat.com/2006/05/02/demand-media-raises-120-million-for-a-bunch-of-shell-websites/#comment-14665911</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I'm not exactly I understand why this business model takes $120 million of capital, but I may be missing something.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Call me simple minded, but I just don't get where the value is.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Dharmesh Shah</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 02 May 2006 12:58:39 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Demand Media raises $120 million for a bunch of shell Websites</title><link>http://venturebeat.com/2006/05/02/demand-media-raises-120-million-for-a-bunch-of-shell-websites/#comment-14665910</link><description>&lt;p&gt;That is a great strategy, as long as step one is:&lt;br&gt;Rewind clock back to 1996&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Blowhard</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 02 May 2006 11:36:41 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Demand Media raises $120 million for a bunch of shell Websites</title><link>http://venturebeat.com/2006/05/02/demand-media-raises-120-million-for-a-bunch-of-shell-websites/#comment-14665909</link><description>&lt;p&gt;It's certainly feasible that this strategy could work. Using AdSense or Yahoo Publisher Network, a web site owner can typically generate $.01 to $.03 in advertising revenue for each user page visit. So, to generate $150k/yr would require 7.5 million page views per year, or 20,500 page views per day. If the avg visitor views 5 pages or so, then this would require 4,000 visitors per day, which is not all that much traffic.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Terry Whalen</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 02 May 2006 06:19:26 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>