<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title>VentureBeat - Latest Comments in Don&amp;#8217;t stop believing: Venture performance didn&amp;#8217;t dip that badly</title><link>http://venturebeat.disqus.com/</link><description>News about Tech, Business and Innovation</description><atom:link href="https://venturebeat.disqus.com/don8217t_stop_believing_venture_performance_didn8217t_dip_that_badly/latest.rss" rel="self"></atom:link><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Tue, 28 Apr 2009 22:35:03 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: Don&amp;#8217;t stop believing: Venture performance didn&amp;#8217;t dip that badly</title><link>http://venturebeat.com/2009/04/27/dont-stop-believing-venture-performance-didnt-dip-that-badly/#comment-8796302</link><description>&lt;p&gt;OK, it was a bit of a cheap shot, but you'll note that in both cases, the odds are pretty bad ...&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Anthony Ha</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 28 Apr 2009 22:35:03 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Don&amp;#8217;t stop believing: Venture performance didn&amp;#8217;t dip that badly</title><link>http://venturebeat.com/2009/04/27/dont-stop-believing-venture-performance-didnt-dip-that-badly/#comment-8796256</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Odds of winning the lottery: 1 in 18 million&lt;br&gt;Odds of building a successful VC backed company: 1 in 1000&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">PeterA650</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 28 Apr 2009 22:33:26 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Don&amp;#8217;t stop believing: Venture performance didn&amp;#8217;t dip that badly</title><link>http://venturebeat.com/2009/04/27/dont-stop-believing-venture-performance-didnt-dip-that-badly/#comment-8794948</link><description>&lt;p&gt;"Nothing has the potential for return that venture capital does."&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;I agree with your other points, Peter, but jeez, if we're just going to judge things based on "potential for return," what about the lottery?&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Anthony Ha</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 28 Apr 2009 21:44:03 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Don&amp;#8217;t stop believing: Venture performance didn&amp;#8217;t dip that badly</title><link>http://venturebeat.com/2009/04/27/dont-stop-believing-venture-performance-didnt-dip-that-badly/#comment-8744121</link><description>&lt;p&gt;In a highly volatile market and a global recession, nobody should be deriving any meaningful conclusions from 1-year data, whether it represents milk sales in Mozambique or steel output in Russia.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;I think this should pretty much silence those who have proclaimed that "VC is dead". Nothing has the potential for return that venture capital does. Also, these numbers represent ROI in strict monetary terms. Let's not forget that this isn't money going towards meat and potatoes projects -- this is money that enables innovation. The fallout and the impact on the overall economy is far larger than this table reveals. It's also impossible to measure.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">PeterA650</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 27 Apr 2009 15:49:39 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>