-
Website
http://venturebeat.com/ -
Original page
http://venturebeat.com/2008/03/07/early-twine-review-twitter-meets-wikipedia/ -
Subscribe
All Comments -
Community
-
Top Commenters
-
Eric Eldon
349 comments · 13 points
-
edsion007
54 comments · 1 points
-
Haggie
87 comments · 3 points
-
Matt Marshall
48 comments · 2 points
-
MG Siegler
1126 comments · 30 points
-
-
Popular Threads
-
16-yr old launches Vye music-sharing site. Another Napster?
1 day ago · 12 comments
-
BookRenter raises $6M to challenge Chegg in textbook rentals
6 hours ago · 1 comment
-
How investigators tracked down a Modern Warfare 2 cyber pirate
2 weeks ago · 206 comments
-
Twitter’s stalled growth could spell bad news for Twitter ecosystem
14 hours ago · 3 comments
-
Sacrifice your health for your startup
21 hours ago · 4 comments
-
16-yr old launches Vye music-sharing site. Another Napster?
One thing that I m wondering about is do I want to give information to a semantic product that is not open source.
What will happen if Twine does something that allows advertisers to have access to my information with out my approval. Are there any access rules in Twine that would allow me to say who can and cannot have my information.
What would happen if Twine were about to be purchased by Microsoft or Google and because of this I wanted to leave the service......I could leave the service....but because it is not Open Source I would not have anywhere to go....Open Source keeps companies honest and gives developers and members the possibility of having another option....
there are a lot tools out there now and under development for working with semantic data. you won't have the twine user interface, but you can use the same data.
@Chris: First, welcome to Twine ... and I'm delighted that we're connected. Please be sure to give my regards to Dean. Second, great "preview" -- because this piece is more like a "preview" than a "review". You grasped the essence of Twine rather quickly. However, let me challenge you on one very important (and potentially misleading) statement: "... some limited ability to "think" by cross-relating all of its accumulated information." Limited? Not true. I would argue that this practically(-speaking) unlimited ability to think is one of Twine's key strengths and sustainable competitive advantages. And it's this "thinking" that makes recommendations made by Twine a cut above anything else on the market. It's a semweb recommender, not your father's recommender: It's way, way beyond "standard" collaborative filtering.
Some of us in the private beta and in a couple of the restricted Twines (Twine Product Community and Twine Evangelism, which I manage) have joked that Twine isn't quite "artificial intelligence," but it's "social software smarts". Twine isn't HAL (as in HAL-9000), but it's not your everyday recommendation system or social network or wiki or threaded online discussion group platform or social bookmarking system, either. It's ALL of these ... and more. Stay tuned ...
http://imindi.typepad.com/imindisaid/