VentureBeat - Latest Comments in Exclusive: Barack Obama to name a “Chief Technology Officer”

Re: Exclusive: Barack Obama to name a “Chief Technology Officer”

Jocky Smith — Wed, 20 Jul 2011 02:42:48 -0000

nice post i like it

Generic Viagra || Kamagra || Cheap Generic Viagra || Caverta || Buy Tadalis

Re: Exclusive: Barack Obama to name a “Chief Technology Officer”

bayram yıldız — Tue, 08 Jun 2010 11:46:13 -0000

The Daily Show doesn't hold back as it covers two of this week's hot topics in a single hilarious segment.
oto kiralama ankara
ankara oto kiralama
oto kiralama ankara
minibüs kiralama
kiralık oto

Re: Exclusive: Barack Obama to name a “Chief Technology Officer”

coach handbags — Sun, 09 May 2010 09:16:52 -0000

Another option for Trendy Diaper discount coach bag is to shop vintage. When you buy a bag that is from a completely different decade, you can be sure that no one else will be sporting this. It doesn’t have to be a bag made specifically for baby's things, either. Just choose any vintage bag that you like, in whatever material and from whichever designer you prefer. As long as it's big enough and has enough pockets to organize bottles, diapers and baby clothes, it may be the perfect fit for you.

Re: Exclusive: Barack Obama to name a “Chief Technology Officer”

ed hardy — Fri, 22 Jan 2010 22:37:39 -0000

This is very useful for me,
thank you very much,
I think you will be successful！

Re: Exclusive: Barack Obama to name a “Chief Technology Officer”

apple mobile — Wed, 06 Jan 2010 02:46:59 -0000

Good post! Thanks for your information!

Re: Exclusive: Barack Obama to name a “Chief Technology Officer”

tiffany rings — Thu, 29 Oct 2009 21:45:00 -0000

And no one is breathing a word on what they plan to do

Re: Exclusive: Barack Obama to name a “Chief Technology Officer”

lucky — Tue, 20 Oct 2009 04:42:03 -0000

The plan extends Obama's previous advocacy for more open decision making in government.

Re: Exclusive: Barack Obama to name a “Chief Technology Officer”

Sarkas — Tue, 06 Oct 2009 17:00:51 -0000

Good thanks! I like this article very much!

Re: Exclusive: Barack Obama to name a “Chief Technology Officer”

edsion007 — Fri, 02 Oct 2009 20:21:43 -0000

Hmmm.. why it has to do with twitter so much?

Re: Exclusive: Barack Obama to name a “Chief Technology Officer”

KKdai — Wed, 14 May 2008 06:14:39 -0000

Our Children’s Education is also on my top list. And no one is breathing a word on what they plan to do

Re: Exclusive: Barack Obama to name a “Chief Technology Officer”

Leandro Haegger — Sun, 16 Dec 2007 16:02:05 -0000

Nice. Thanks.

Re: Exclusive: Barack Obama to name a “Chief Technology Officer”

Leandro Haegger — Sun, 16 Dec 2007 16:00:45 -0000

Very well.

Re: Exclusive: Barack Obama to name a “Chief Technology Officer”

Leandro Haegger — Sun, 16 Dec 2007 15:34:56 -0000

Very Good Article

Re: Exclusive: Barack Obama to name a “Chief Technology Officer”

Leandro Haegger — Sun, 16 Dec 2007 15:33:42 -0000

Very Good Article. Thanks.

Re: Exclusive: Barack Obama to name a “Chief Technology Officer”

Daniel J. Lyons III — Mon, 10 Dec 2007 09:23:17 -0000

Rich Media Solutions Provider..

100% Customizable Flash Media Webcasting!

212.584.2408

Re: Exclusive: Barack Obama to name a “Chief Technology Officer”

urb — Wed, 21 Nov 2007 05:59:10 -0000

I'm impressed that Obama has put forth a unique and relevant vision for how technology can be used more effectively in government. This is another indication that he has a different perspective, focus, and approach for our country.

Re: Exclusive: Barack Obama to name a “Chief Technology Officer”

John — Thu, 15 Nov 2007 13:54:43 -0000

Great, so I'll have to pay communication companies as an incentive to roll out broadband access to rural areas. Thats just where I want my hard earned money to go..

Re: Exclusive: Barack Obama to name a “Chief Technology Officer”

Stephen — Thu, 15 Nov 2007 03:38:22 -0000

I don't need the government to waste my taxpayer dollars to hire someone to teach them how to use technology. No thanks. Learn on your own like I did. Gad.

Re: Exclusive: Barack Obama to name a “Chief Technology Officer”

Slacker — Thu, 15 Nov 2007 03:25:05 -0000

Obama has a good chance to take the election.

http://askaslacker.blogspot...

Re: Exclusive: Barack Obama to name a “Chief Technology Officer”

bob dobbs — Thu, 15 Nov 2007 02:12:32 -0000

This is a technique to get civilian populations to expose their political and social information to government wiretaps. The 4th amendment protects us.

for the public forum let us discuss the federal reserve and council on foreign relations.

Re: Exclusive: Barack Obama to name a “Chief Technology Officer”

C Johnson — Thu, 15 Nov 2007 00:03:06 -0000

Well he is about the only one that is making sense now. So far he looks good. But I want to see what else he plans to do... Health care, Our Children's Education is also on my top list. And no one is breathing a word on what they plan to do. As another thing that worries me is these top businesses outsourcing, and or moving to other countries, and leaving us Americans without a job. You just don't know what this is like until it happens to you after you put years of your sweat into a company.

Re: Exclusive: Barack Obama to name a “Chief Technology Officer”

Alex K — Wed, 14 Nov 2007 20:45:36 -0000

I would include more in the article from Obama's document on privacy. See pages 3-4, section: "Safeguard our Right to Privacy."

My opinion on privacy:
I would love for Obama to address the issue of oversight. I am all for giving our security institutions the tools they need. However data should only be gathered on supposed terrorists, and oversight should be used to insure that those tools aren't being abused. We're at a critical time where the government can now begin to collect data on most of its citizens: The next president needs to set precedent that the data collected and the tools themselves won't be abused.

Re: Exclusive: Barack Obama to name a “Chief Technology Officer”

Cam — Wed, 14 Nov 2007 19:20:27 -0000

TONY:
Except that Net Neutrality used to be required when broadband was classified as a communications service. A couple of years ago, the FCC was convinced (one can only wonder by whom) to change the status to an information service, to which the common carriers regulations do not apply. So all this hoo-ha about "too much regulation" is unfounded, the Internet used to have Net Neutrality and now that it's gone people are worried (which is understandable). For companies, capitalism means increasing profits and decreasing costs. For consumers, this means paying more for worse service.

Re: Exclusive: Barack Obama to name a “Chief Technology Officer”

Tony — Wed, 14 Nov 2007 16:56:12 -0000

About net neutrality, what are your thoughts?

It comes to this:
1. Do you want to invite the government into regulating the internet?
or
2. Would you rather rely on the free market.

The Net Neutrality bill is yet another example of a bill that sounds like a good idea, but once you give the government the right to regulate the internet, where will it stop.

"Net-Neutrality" is inviting the government onto the internet to regulate it, vs. companies deciding how to regulate it based on the free market

Ask yourself this. Would you like to invite the FCC control of the internet? Or an FCC-type bureaucracy? I'd rather keep the government out of it..

IOW, Net Neutrality is a bandaid.

Re: Exclusive: Barack Obama to name a “Chief Technology Officer”

Gold — Wed, 14 Nov 2007 16:46:14 -0000

GAMEBOY: You seem to think our organizing principle should be: Good For Everybody In The Whole World!

That is so preposterous I can't even summon up any admiration for the high idealism that must underlie such a position. Perhaps you are familiar with Pascal's wise observation that while man is neither angel nor beast, he who would act the angel acts the beast.

I don't myself believe that America needs more people to keep our economy running smoothly. There was very nearly no immigration at all into the U.S.A. from 1945 to 1965, yet the economy boomed as never before. How did that happen? A national economy is a very flexible and ingenious thing, certainly able to cope with shortages, of labor or anything else, by means other than immigration. It might raise wages, or automate, or outsource. Indeed, many economists tell us that automation, and technological advance in general, is retarded by a large supply of cheap manual labor.

I do not want these people. I don't think I am a callous person—I am pretty sure than no-one who knows me would describe me so—but I am not generous towards strangers with things I own that are precious to me, that I have struggled and sweated to acquire. If the stranger has a hard-luck story I may do him the courtesy of listening to it; but the world, you know, is full of hard-luck stories.

Of course we can deport 12 million people if we want to. Our nation has, by acts of collective will, done far more difficult things than that. If sensible policies were implemented, great numbers of illegal immigrants would anyway self-deport.