DISQUS

VentureBeat: Facebook and Twitter: There’s blood everywhere, but no one is dying

  • marshal sandler · 10 months ago
    Facebook is a little young to kill any one ,the site still needs to be navigable and all I find is we get lost in a Sea of Applications ! I mean some one sent me a Super Chicken today on Facebook some of their applications seem to created by a drowning man ! I respect their efforts but they need some logic at the wheel and an Index ! If you grow to fast you may just lose site of your objective, I still can't find their objective, they should hire Twitter not buy them !
  • MG Siegler · 10 months ago
    I don't entirely disagree Marshal. The old K-I-S-S approach: Keep It Simple Stupid. Facebook is way beyond simple now.
  • Matt Shaulis · 10 months ago
    I, however, *do* entirely disagree.

    Facebook is actually the opposite of "a little young" (especially in the company of Twitter and Friendfeed). Also, Facebook apps are like the blogosphere... some of them are top quality (see: VentureBeat, for example), and others are "Me Too" garbage that probably oughtn't be taking up hard-drive space anywhere (see: most other blogs, with a handful of exceptions). Fact remains, Facebook created the platform, not the application... the platform is king and sometimes the applications are awesome... most of the time they suck, just like blogs... but the platform is justified by the value-adding, top-quality apps. You can not blame Facebook for your bad chicken experience... blame your stupid "friend" who thought it appropriate to send a flipping Super Chicken to you, of all people. I don't even know you and already I can ascertain that sending you something called a "Super Chicken" is a baaaad idea.
  • marshal sandler · 10 months ago
    Platforms may be king but content wears the Crown. Chicken Apps are at a low level of Abstraction ! Hamlet Survives will the promoters of chicken app's ! Thanks for the reply !

    "The lady doth protest too much, methinks."

    --From Hamlet (III, ii, 239)


    Queen Gertrude speaks these famous words to her son, Prince Hamlet, while watching a play at court. Gertrude does not realize that Hamlet has staged this play to trap her and her new husband, King Claudius, whom Hamlet suspects of having murdered his father. She also does not realize that the lady who "doth protest too much" is actually herself, as the Player King and Queen represent King Hamlet and Queen Gertrude. The former will be poisoned (in this play within the play) by the king's brother, as in reality (Hamlet suspects) Claudius killed King Hamlet. Gertrude's statement is in response to the play-Queen's repetitive statements of loyalty to and love of her first husband.
    "HEH "
    half laugh, semi-cynical connotation, used on IRC by those too cool to say lol or roflmao
  • Matt Shaulis · 10 months ago
    "But it's got some Labrador in it."

    --From 'Up In Smoke'

    Tommy Chong speaks these famous words to cult icon, Cheech, while they smoke a contraband cigarette containing dog feces. Cheech had not realized (until that point) that excrement was involved. Hilarity ensues.
  • marshal sandler · 10 months ago
    It bothers me I just can't define the mission on Facebook from a marketing standpoint ! I just reblogged your article with zemanta hope it does it justice .
    http://marshalsandler.com/2009/02/facebook-and-... you created some my kind of content and at 72 years old I have read a lot even my blog has a mission statement
    MarshalSandler.com is a playground of ideas, introductions, and synergies. Marshal exhibits a blogging style that is less about tamping out his thoughts and more about the juggling, rearranging, juxtaposing, and syndicating of the content of other people and companies - a communications cubism of sorts. There’s no room for crap, but there is plenty of room for friendly people with interesting ideas. Marshal’s day is the search for new technologies, new ideas, new relationships, and new things to curse happily about. So, participate. Cut bait
  • gianouts · 10 months ago
    Excellent post. I agree that they are used quite differently. I also have different sets of people on each. It will be interesting to see how this plays out, but I think it could actually be good for Twitter. As you mentioned in your post, there is the potential now of Reciprocal Status Updates between Twitter and Facebook. I would definitely like to see this, and in fact wrote a blog post about this a couple of weeks back: http://gianouts.blogspot.com/2009/01/reciprocal...
  • Jonathon Martin · 10 months ago
    While you may be right that Twitter users will not leave Twitter, it may well be enough to slow down or stop new signups. Twitter is very much a US thing, whereas Facebook status updates are global. Facebook is much larger (%wise) in some other countries than in the US. If you start to run with a non-US based crowd I think you'll end up at Facebook.
  • warzabidul · 10 months ago
    Users will leave twitter, it's a negative feedback loop. More and more of those I follow on twitter spend less and less time on the site, and as they spend less time on the site so my insentive and dedication to the service is declining.

    I do think that facebook has the most chance of staying around for the simple reason that those you add as friends are people you have met and studied with, worked with and more. As a result loyalty is higher than for the random followers you have on twitter.

    Friendfeed is far smoother and intuitive to use than friendfeed, and whilst more noisy is easier to manage. Personally, as a European my interest in twitter has dropped.

    Now I don't see twitter as anything more than a glorified chatroom.
  • MG Siegler · 10 months ago
    the beauty of twitter though is that you don't have to spend time on the site. most of the data comes through outside updates through the API.
  • warzabidul · 10 months ago
    I want to spend time on the site though, I want to be engaged. I liked having twhirl run as I did other things. I like knowing that people are attentive to what is going on in twitter because I can comment on what they are doing and get a reply. If I comment 20 times and get five answers then the purpose of the site disappears.

    That's why so few people use jaiku and identi.ca, because there is little engagement by the supposed audience.
  • MG Siegler · 10 months ago
    Numbers indicate that we're seeing big growth in Twitter internationally though, and I consider that to continue this year. It's already got big growth in the UK and Japan.

    http://venturebeat.com/2008/07/16/twitter-made-...
  • warzabidul · 10 months ago
    I'm well aware of that. I was in London for over a year as a twitter user and the community there is a strong and vibrant one. That sense of community leads anyone in that bubble to believe that twitter is the future of communications and that's fun. It's a great ambiance.

    The problem is when you move to another country, Switzerland for example. Here you have about 1500 users spread across the whole of the country, you have a diversity of professionals. A result of this is how hard it is to get people to meet as a group. People don't see the social media and twitter as a good way of spending their time yet. It may change but it may take two years or more at this rate.

    It's a matter of time, in Europe twitter users need to be patient, attempt to encourage more people to use it.
  • Yuri Ammosov · 10 months ago
    There are many ways to waste time and few to ways to work productively.
  • MG Siegler · 10 months ago
    welcome to the Internet :)
  • warzabidul · 10 months ago
    You overlook the fact that as new users with a different agenda start to use twitter so the dynamics have changed, hence a new group of users. For those that have been around for over a year, who have built up friendships, used it as a social tool for a long period of time there is a definite change in how twitter is used.

    For a start everyone is worried about productivity now. The vast majority of people come to twitter for less than twenty minutes a day, answer a few messages and disappear. They no longer stick around for those 30 person 200 tweet conversations anymore as a result of which the community has been weakened.

    I say this having been both to the earliest tweetups as well as the latest. At the early tweet ups you spend weeks and months making friends with specific users and getting to meet them in person was a great adventure. Now people sign up to twitter with less than 30 posts and go to the tweetup. The result is that it's a lot more strangers than when twitter was younger.

    That's de-valued twitter as a social network, especially in Europe. If you're in London then twitter is perfect. Move to almost any other city around Europe though and twitter is a frustrating experience, exacerbated by the new generation of users that are only just finding their feet.

    That's part of the reason I am taking ten days away from twitter. If after those ten days I come back and feel the same frustration as I have recently then twitter is dead to me, as an individual and that's what counts. I'm sick of putting so much time and effort into something no one honestly believes in. To use a site is one thing. For it to be part of your lifestyle though, more is required.
  • MG Siegler · 10 months ago
    I definitely agree that the usage patterns of Twitter are shifting, we saw this during the U.S. election, and saw it shift again after. But depending on who you follow, these shifts can almost be personalized too. A feature like being able to group Twitter friends -- kind of like what FriendFeed has, would probably help this. But I think people use it for a lot of different things, not just the way you use it.
  • warzabidul · 10 months ago
    We saw it the day SMS notification in Europe was cancelled. From that day on Twitter in Europe was no longer mobile, until a few weeks to months later when a variety of mobile solutions were offered. The US elections were an opportunity for twitter to play with some new features and see whether they had an audience.

    Now we see a third change. as more and more celebrities come to the web and the fans come to listen, but not yet participate. More and more people are trying to sell what they're doing rather than engage with the individuals.

    I went back to some video of the first London meetup and when asked how many people they were following people went as low as to say they're following just 20 people. Now people who have been on twitter for a month and a half have three thousand. That would lead us to believe that twitter is no longer about giving your status to a select group of strangers. Now it's marketing to the masses.

    That's part of the reason I moved to plurk a few months ago and to Friendfeed more recently, to get back that sense of community, and engagement.
  • Jeff Pester · 10 months ago
    Great post MG, and a great complement to the post from Fred Wilson (Union Square Ventures - Twitter Investor) yesterday "Hasn't It Always Been About Status?" http://bit.ly/g8ZK.

    In one of Fred's comments in that post he says "I've said so many times that "this service kills this other service" meme is mostly bullshit. Most deaths are self inflicted. And twitter has certainly tried to kill itself more than once. But I'm not buying into the idea that facebook and twitter are the same experience."

    Right said Fred!
  • MG Siegler · 10 months ago
    Thanks Jeff, yeah linked to Fred's post above -- though I missed that comment, which is definitely a good one. I've said pretty much the same thing before as well in "The only thing Twitter has to fear, is Twitter itself"

    http://venturebeat.com/2008/05/24/the-only-thin...

    Probably worth noting though that while Fred is an investor in Twitter, I am not :)
  • fredwilson · 10 months ago
    i wrote that post yesterday to celebrate what facebook has done by elevating status as the ulitmate social gesture. and people just start doing that "x vs y" thing. my point is that a rising tide will lift all boats in it. but so many people are stuck in a zero sum mentality. it's really telling.
  • Jeff Pester · 10 months ago
    I guess the good news for everyone in this space is that people are really passionate - for one/the other/ both/or neither! And they're interacting with each other in groups/networks/conversations that were mostly unavailable until relatively recently. Yeah, I think (most) everybody wins playing in this sandbox.
  • marshal sandler · 10 months ago
    Shout out for Fred Wilson who really understand Game theory and General Semantic's
    Korzybski's work held a view that human beings are limited in what they know by (1) the structure of their nervous systems, and (2) the structure of their languages. Human beings cannot experience the world directly, but only through their "abstractions" (nonverbal impressions or "gleanings" derived from the nervous system, and verbal indicators expressed and derived from language). Sometimes our perceptions and our languages actually mislead us as to the "facts" with which we must deal. Our understanding of what is going on sometimes lacks similarity of structure with what is actually going on. He stressed training in awareness of abstracting, using techniques that he had derived from his study of mathematics and science. He called this awareness, this goal of his system, "consciousness of abstracting." His system included modifying the way we approach the world, e.g., with an attitude of "I don't know; let's see," to better discover or reflect its realities as shown by modern science. One of these techniques involved becoming inwardly and outwardly quiet, an experience that he called, "silence on the objective levels."
  • Laurent Blondeau (evidencesx) · 10 months ago
    twitter is a real useful timeline, while FB, a great "entertainment" park, as a conclusion. I find every day more and more reason to twit, and so much others reasons, to not spend too much time on FB. Not that FB is not achieved (I could be the only one who says that!), but too polluted by so eyecatching for nothing. Growing potential as well, but twitter is more efficient in short term effects.
    Great post,
    best r.
    L.
  • MG Siegler · 10 months ago
    Thanks Laurent, I like that idea of Facebook as an amusement park. Twitter is more like a fun ride -- without some of the lines.
  • optionshiftk · 10 months ago
    Facebook is a glorified address book, something Jason Calacanis has harped on quite frequently. The demographic of facebook users is very unsophisticated computer users who can't even seem to manage to delete "is" when writing a status message. The twitter crowd is a different breed.
  • eas · 10 months ago
    I think it is a mistake to make too much of comparisons of Twitter's small userbase to Facebook's huge userbase. It's like saying a pizza tastes better than a supermarket. Both have something to do with food, but on a completely different scale.
  • Santosh · 10 months ago
    Excellent posts. I think all the sites are going to survive. I noticed a site www.ping.fm and it is sending updates to all twitter like accounts you have. Some of the twitter clones are better than twitter. Only thing missing is the popularity.
  • patricia · 10 months ago
    There will always be room for more than one message board.
  • John · 10 months ago
    Is that Brett Petersel's pic from mashable? Great pic.
  • MG Siegler · 10 months ago
    Maybe, it's Christian Bale from the great American Psycho.
  • Jason · 10 months ago
    There can't be too much blood spilled when no one's profitable.
  • MG Siegler · 10 months ago
    Poor people still bleed, no?
  • K-party · 10 months ago
    I'm very impressed. When you're not writing about Apple, the blinders come off and you do damn good non-biased analysis.

    /backhanded compliment
  • MG Siegler · 10 months ago
    Ha yes, thanks for that backhanded compliment.
  • Warren Colbert · 10 months ago
    Apple haters never sleep and do not relent. Nice photo MG.

    Maybe I'm just lazy, but I'm going to continue posting to Facebook through my twitter feed. I don't have the time to do both quite frankly. Recently, I think I am getting way more value out of Twitter than Facebook.
  • Gadget Sleuth · 10 months ago
    There can be more than one, but in this climate, can there be more than one truly dominant site? I'm not so sure.
  • seanmacdhai · 10 months ago
    Twitter is more than just "status updates". It is an online community of folks that blog short messages with each other, sharing their lives. Facebook opening up their status updates will not impace Twitter because each service attracts a different kind of user.
  • Eliiott · 10 months ago
    Aside from Facebook, Twitter and FriendFeed have revenue of $5.99. Just enough to pick up a six pack of Coors. Please explain who the hell uses FriendFeed. I Also have a Twitter account but only because other people do. Are these companies going to drive revenue or just cater to nerds looking at new technologies.
  • wecandobiz · 10 months ago
    Twitter won't see the pinnacle of its success until it is easier to use. Those of us who "get it" know that you never visit the website but use a third-party app; and that you don't actually tell anyone what you are doing because no-one wants to read that. But how do new visitors know that? How many people go and look at the Twitter website, wonder what the fuss is about and then leave? My guess is that their conversion rate on visitors is a fraction of what Facebook enjoys.

    Make it MUCH more apparent to new users where the power is in Twitter use -- not to mention perhaps bundling all the useful stuff together up front so people can get effective quicker -- and things would be a whole stack different.

    That said, I am against mixing friends and work, so I will probably forever use Facebook AND Twitter. Friendfeed I also use, but it takes all its updates from Twitter...

    Ian Hendry
    CEO, WeCanDo.BIZ
    http://www.wecando.biz
  • Engago team · 10 months ago
    The recession (or depresssion) will take care if there is no business model.
    If Spielberg can't get funding for his movies, who is going to fund free services?
  • swag · 10 months ago
    Screw them both. Six months I'll jump on the next bandwagon while they both die a horrible death of quaint Internet antiquity.
  • jvincent · 8 months ago
    I finally manged to sign on
  • jvincent · 8 months ago
    Okay were finally getting good wether
  • BenN · 10 months ago
    On Facebook, try doing
    MG has found out you can see Rod Stewart’s house from his parent’s.
    That works. It's just a matter of rephrasing stuff to start with your name, and that makes a lot of sense considering the number of random messages that could appear in your News Feed otherwise.
  • MG Siegler · 10 months ago
    Of course, but it sounds kind of weird to write in third person, Bob Dole says. Point is, I'm not always saying things that revolve around me, so it's a stretch to tie some of those into Facebook updates.
  • Marcos Nobre · 10 months ago
    I find that the least important question. Twitter is like throwing/crashing a party which everyone can crash/throw without disturbing anyone. FB is just an ordinary party, invitations only. Feel it?
  • Tucker · 10 months ago
    Selling discounted iTunes Gift Card's For more info email me at ttasur@gmail.com

    Ill let you know that im trusted :)

    US$200 iTunes Gift Certificate; PAY US $100
    US$100 iTunes Gift Certificate; PAY US$ 50
  • Vegetable · 10 months ago
    Tonight's the night
  • MG Siegler · 10 months ago
    Yes, Rod thinks so.