<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title>VentureBeat - Latest Comments in Facebook: Twitter is in the &amp;#8220;rear-view mirror&amp;#8221;</title><link>http://venturebeat.disqus.com/</link><description>News about Tech, Business and Innovation</description><atom:link href="https://venturebeat.disqus.com/facebook_twitter_is_in_the_8220rear_view_mirror8221/latest.rss" rel="self"></atom:link><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Wed, 23 Jun 2010 01:55:47 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: Facebook: Twitter is in the &amp;#8220;rear-view mirror&amp;#8221;</title><link>http://digital.venturebeat.com/2009/09/18/facebook-twitter-is-in-the-rear-view-mirror/#comment-58168940</link><description>&lt;p&gt;gasGg&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Few</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 23 Jun 2010 01:55:47 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Facebook: Twitter is in the &amp;#8220;rear-view mirror&amp;#8221;</title><link>http://digital.venturebeat.com/2009/09/18/facebook-twitter-is-in-the-rear-view-mirror/#comment-37551873</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Here, I want to say: you are successful, I hope you will do better!&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">links of london</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 02 Mar 2010 02:04:07 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Facebook: Twitter is in the &amp;#8220;rear-view mirror&amp;#8221;</title><link>http://digital.venturebeat.com/2009/09/18/facebook-twitter-is-in-the-rear-view-mirror/#comment-17040605</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I think it's silly when execs make comments like this.  Facebook should keep doing what it's doing.  I didn't see them as copying Twitter with their updates function.  To me it's a natural way for them to integrate not only with Twitter but also with a host of other services.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;The important conversation is not who's competing with who, but how the hundreds of services can be aggregated to provide a better experience for the user.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Colin Clark</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 21 Sep 2009 12:19:23 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Facebook: Twitter is in the &amp;#8220;rear-view mirror&amp;#8221;</title><link>http://digital.venturebeat.com/2009/09/18/facebook-twitter-is-in-the-rear-view-mirror/#comment-16961614</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Twitter reminds of of wordperfect competing against MS word. Facebook will take all the same features as a (very small) subset of their service, and leverage their larger and more active user base to drive Twitter into the ground. Sad to say but too little and (waaaay) too late for Twitter. I'm still rooting for them though.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Joe Carchioni</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 20 Sep 2009 05:31:31 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Facebook: Twitter is in the &amp;#8220;rear-view mirror&amp;#8221;</title><link>http://digital.venturebeat.com/2009/09/18/facebook-twitter-is-in-the-rear-view-mirror/#comment-16916638</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Facebook imitates popular features from many rival services, there objectives are obvious but dismissing Twitter as a threat is ignorance. Twitter may have significantly less users but with the hyped Internet of things, a network of objects, such as household appliances. Everything will have identity and they will be communicating with each other...&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Joe Dawson</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 19 Sep 2009 06:12:33 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Facebook: Twitter is in the &amp;#8220;rear-view mirror&amp;#8221;</title><link>http://digital.venturebeat.com/2009/09/18/facebook-twitter-is-in-the-rear-view-mirror/#comment-16889195</link><description>&lt;p&gt;If twitter is in facebook's rear-view mirror, why are they adding features that are exactly like the functionality that twitter offers?  Don't copy another site and then say that you aren't paying any attention to them.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">David Spinks</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 18 Sep 2009 15:03:01 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Facebook: Twitter is in the &amp;#8220;rear-view mirror&amp;#8221;</title><link>http://digital.venturebeat.com/2009/09/18/facebook-twitter-is-in-the-rear-view-mirror/#comment-16888778</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Facebook says they don't see Twitter as a threat? yeah, right! Their actions prove otherwise.&lt;br&gt;Facebook has copied Twitter in allowing people to mention or tag others in their status(very similar to Twitter's @ replies). Facebook has copied Twitter(or is about to from what I've been reading)by allowing members to have real-time updates.&lt;br&gt;I don't try to be like someone else if I'm not threatened by them. And there are other things Facebook's copying Twitter in.&lt;br&gt;So if Facebook doesn't see Twitter as a threat why is Facebook trying so hard to be like Twitter?&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ChrisCarl</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 18 Sep 2009 14:55:32 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Facebook: Twitter is in the &amp;#8220;rear-view mirror&amp;#8221;</title><link>http://digital.venturebeat.com/2009/09/18/facebook-twitter-is-in-the-rear-view-mirror/#comment-16886065</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Hi Matt,&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;There is no doubt that twitter is a powerful tool for both business and *fun*, but actually people are abusing ths fantatic social media, so it becomes a little bit spammy.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;I hope they'll find a solution to stop those Blackhat*ers/Spammers/Scammers.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Regards&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Tonny Stone</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 18 Sep 2009 14:03:47 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>