<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title>VentureBeat - Latest Comments in Flock still trying to take flight</title><link>http://venturebeat.disqus.com/</link><description>News about Tech, Business and Innovation</description><atom:link href="https://venturebeat.disqus.com/flock_still_trying_to_take_flight/latest.rss" rel="self"></atom:link><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Tue, 21 Aug 2007 20:17:30 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: Flock still trying to take flight</title><link>http://venturebeat.com/2007/07/04/flock-still-trying-to-take-flight/#comment-14676420</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Software with an update service allows the company to have a pretty good ball park idea of how many active users they have. Of course, this number doesn't look as good as downloads, so you won't be getting it anytime soon.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Yours truly,&lt;br&gt;"One blogger from the Flock developer community",&lt;br&gt;Former Flock employee (#9),&lt;br&gt;Lloyd Budd&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Lloyd Dewolf</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 21 Aug 2007 20:17:30 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Flock still trying to take flight</title><link>http://venturebeat.com/2007/07/04/flock-still-trying-to-take-flight/#comment-14676419</link><description>&lt;p&gt;@Chris: You'll see that in the article, I cited Firefox saying Mozilla made $55 million in 2005. In that same article (from May), the CEO guesses that the number of users is between 75-100 million. Another source put it at 85 million. I've clarified that this is not downloads.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;...which leads me to...&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;@Paul: The official counter counts every single download of any release since 1.0. Which means that since I've been using FF since around 1.0, I'll personally account for a download per version through 2.0.0.4.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;So, anyone have a verifiable number of active Firefox users now?&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Eric Eldon</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 04 Jul 2007 22:19:31 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Flock still trying to take flight</title><link>http://venturebeat.com/2007/07/04/flock-still-trying-to-take-flight/#comment-14676418</link><description>&lt;p&gt;We're at 370 million downloads and counting, Matt. There's an accurate counter at &lt;a href="http://spreadfirefox.com" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="http://spreadfirefox.com"&gt;http://spreadfirefox.com&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Paul Kim</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 04 Jul 2007 21:58:04 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Flock still trying to take flight</title><link>http://venturebeat.com/2007/07/04/flock-still-trying-to-take-flight/#comment-14676417</link><description>&lt;p&gt;also, Hardin should check his facts too. if mozilla earned $2 per user as Hardin suggests, Mozilla would be making something near $200 million... i personally have never heard that they are making anywhere near that amount... have you??&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;google was the default search for mozilla and then firefox way before google paid mozilla any money (we are talking years). i think it is great flock is making good money from yahoo, but you really should do a little fact checking.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Chris</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 04 Jul 2007 21:36:44 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Flock still trying to take flight</title><link>http://venturebeat.com/2007/07/04/flock-still-trying-to-take-flight/#comment-14676416</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I was just at a preso by Mozilla folks that said Firefox had more than 100 million users (which is way more than the 85 million downloads). Do some research man.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Chris</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 04 Jul 2007 21:29:51 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>