<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title>VentureBeat - Latest Comments in Funds blow in for Mariah&amp;#8217;s residential wind turbine</title><link>http://venturebeat.disqus.com/</link><description>News about Tech, Business and Innovation</description><atom:link href="https://venturebeat.disqus.com/funds_blow_in_for_mariah8217s_residential_wind_turbine_07/latest.rss" rel="self"></atom:link><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Mon, 09 Mar 2009 15:25:36 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: Funds blow in for Mariah&amp;#8217;s residential wind turbine</title><link>http://venturebeat.com/2008/12/10/funds-blow-in-for-mariahs-residential-wind-turbine/#comment-7038774</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Do not buy Freetricity's products.  You will not receive them but the bonus is they keep the money!!!  It's a scam!&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Julie</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 09 Mar 2009 15:25:36 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Funds blow in for Mariah&amp;#8217;s residential wind turbine</title><link>http://venturebeat.com/2008/12/10/funds-blow-in-for-mariahs-residential-wind-turbine/#comment-4379266</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Sean, it's the $5,000 model that will pay for itself in saved costs within 10 years, not the cheaper competing turbines I mentioned from Freetricity and the like. I hope that helps clarify things!&lt;br&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Camille Ricketts</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 12 Dec 2008 18:35:50 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Funds blow in for Mariah&amp;#8217;s residential wind turbine</title><link>http://venturebeat.com/2008/12/10/funds-blow-in-for-mariahs-residential-wind-turbine/#comment-4313471</link><description>&lt;p&gt;This is great. I am all about people being independant when it comes to energy.  Is there a better way to become less effected by failing gov't policies and the economy.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;There are 2 rather conflicting statements in this article though....&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;"Priced at $1,400 to $2,300, it provides a fairly affordable solution for lowering electric bills"&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;"A promising 4,000 pre-orders have already been received at $4995 a pop — a figure that could climb"&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;....What gives? $1400-$2300 is "ok" and will only get me my money back in a decade which is really not that great of an investment. Does this mean that it may take me 20-40 years to get my money back at the price tag of $5000? That is an even worse investment.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Do I have my wires crossed or does is anyone else confused here???&lt;br&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Sean</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 10 Dec 2008 14:20:51 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>