<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title>VentureBeat - Latest Comments in Google needs a new name for its wicked Holodeck</title><link>http://venturebeat.disqus.com/</link><description>News about Tech, Business and Innovation</description><atom:link href="https://venturebeat.disqus.com/google_needs_a_new_name_for_its_wicked_holodeck/latest.rss" rel="self"></atom:link><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Thu, 19 Nov 2009 14:16:45 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: Google needs a new name for its wicked Holodeck</title><link>http://digital.venturebeat.com/2009/10/19/google-needs-a-new-name-for-its-wicked-holodeck/#comment-23557504</link><description>&lt;p&gt;May I suggest the following name;&lt;br&gt;"GOOGLE HOLOPLEX"&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Ghulam Hidayatallah</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 19 Nov 2009 14:16:45 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Google needs a new name for its wicked Holodeck</title><link>http://digital.venturebeat.com/2009/10/19/google-needs-a-new-name-for-its-wicked-holodeck/#comment-20596760</link><description>&lt;p&gt;It looks a lot like a modern version of the 1955 technology Disney used (and still uses) in their theme parks. "Circlevision 360" is the term.  In that version, it was not interactive.  They had 9 screens spaced around a circle, with a projector between each screen (in the black space between the screens), aimed across the room at the opposite screen.  They could film with 9 synced cameras mounted around one point to produce the films.  This is really quite the same, but no projectors are needed since you'd use monitors.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">DuaneDude1</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 19 Oct 2009 21:27:10 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>