<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title>VentureBeat - Latest Comments in Google still playing with image recognition</title><link>http://venturebeat.disqus.com/</link><description>News about Tech, Business and Innovation</description><atom:link href="https://venturebeat.disqus.com/google_still_playing_with_image_recognition/latest.rss" rel="self"></atom:link><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Wed, 10 Nov 2010 16:37:04 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: Google still playing with image recognition</title><link>http://digital.venturebeat.com/2009/06/22/google-still-playing-with-image-recognition/#comment-96037593</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Google is intensively working with images from Picasa, Panoramio (BTW, it's PanoramiO, not PanoramiA :))&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">TripBY</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 10 Nov 2010 16:37:04 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Google still playing with image recognition</title><link>http://digital.venturebeat.com/2009/06/22/google-still-playing-with-image-recognition/#comment-37548794</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Here, I want to say: you are successful, I hope you will do better!&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">links of london</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 02 Mar 2010 00:43:26 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Google still playing with image recognition</title><link>http://digital.venturebeat.com/2009/06/22/google-still-playing-with-image-recognition/#comment-37534458</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Here, I want to say: you are successful, I hope you will do better!&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Jessica Riley</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 01 Mar 2010 20:58:52 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Google still playing with image recognition</title><link>http://digital.venturebeat.com/2009/06/22/google-still-playing-with-image-recognition/#comment-30101235</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Yikes, the placemarks default to dragable &amp;amp; say they save when you move them. Fortunately re-doing the search resets them &amp;amp; it doesn't seem to be affecting other users.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;The un-lettered placemark seems to be your hotel &amp;amp; moving it can re-plan the whole thing :-) Moving things your visiting around also appears to refresh subsequent suggestions&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">website video</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 17 Jan 2010 15:54:37 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Google still playing with image recognition</title><link>http://digital.venturebeat.com/2009/06/22/google-still-playing-with-image-recognition/#comment-13257833</link><description>&lt;p&gt;This isn't new.  This idea was brought before T.E.D. quite a long while back, had the programming to go with it for the demo, used flickr to get/catalog it's photos, and the demo place was Notre Dam.  There was even the amusing anecdote of the program finding an angle of the landmark in a calendar behind a student in the photo.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">fuckyourself arroganttwat</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 24 Jul 2009 03:56:05 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>