-
Website
http://venturebeat.com/ -
Original page
http://venturebeat.com/2007/07/13/greentech-notes-solopower-mwoe-sntech/ -
Subscribe
All Comments -
Community
-
Top Commenters
-
Eric Eldon
349 comments · 13 points
-
edsion007
54 comments · 1 points
-
Haggie
87 comments · 3 points
-
Matt Marshall
48 comments · 2 points
-
MG Siegler
1126 comments · 30 points
-
-
Popular Threads
-
5 o’clock roundup: Mac fans try to hijack Windows, Emblaze unveils First Else smartphone
6 hours ago · 3 comments
-
Augmented reality to be a $732 million market by 2014?
2 hours ago · 1 comment
-
Pixable lets you print out customized calendars from Facebook content
1 day ago · 22 comments
-
Blood in the streets?
12 hours ago · 4 comments
-
Hulu U.S. video streams soar by nearly 50 percent in October, Google’s YouTube flat
11 hours ago · 3 comments
-
5 o’clock roundup: Mac fans try to hijack Windows, Emblaze unveils First Else smartphone
Looking for this kind of cooperation.
Cheers
Li
Email: lihongrui@gmail.com
Thin-film PV units are made by depositing semiconductors like Si or CuInGaSe2 (CIGS) on a substrate which is not a semiconductor. For example, Powerfilm deposits amorphous Si on plastic, Unisolar deposits amorphous Si on stainless steel, and Nanosolar deposits CIGS on something or other. Whether or not these thin-film solar cells are flexible depends on whether or not the substrates are flexible. Glass is a popular substrate for thin-film PV and it's not too flexible.
Why do we care about thin-film if the PV cells are not necessarily flexible? It's because thin-film cells have the potential to be more efficient (like CIGS), cheaper (poly-Si or amorphous Si) or more lightweight than bulk Si. For most applications, flexibility is not important.
Hope this helps!