<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title>VentureBeat - Latest Comments in Hulu could catch YouTube in 2009 &amp;#8212; in revenue, not traffic</title><link>http://venturebeat.disqus.com/</link><description>News about Tech, Business and Innovation</description><atom:link href="https://venturebeat.disqus.com/hulu_could_catch_youtube_in_2009_8212_in_revenue_not_traffic_70/latest.rss" rel="self"></atom:link><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Thu, 22 Jul 2010 09:16:38 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: Hulu could catch YouTube in 2009 &amp;#8212; in revenue, not traffic</title><link>http://digital.venturebeat.com/2008/11/17/hulu-could-catch-youtube-in-2009-in-revenue-not-traffic/#comment-63706781</link><description>&lt;p&gt;That's the great article! I just pass 'n read it, two thumbs up! ;)&lt;br&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Digital Key Cabinet</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 22 Jul 2010 09:16:38 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Hulu could catch YouTube in 2009 &amp;#8212; in revenue, not traffic</title><link>http://digital.venturebeat.com/2008/11/17/hulu-could-catch-youtube-in-2009-in-revenue-not-traffic/#comment-47809163</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Oh if I were Hulu I wouldn't mind not catching up with YouTube's huge traffic! If I have come close to YouTube's revenues even with lesser traffic then this is an achievement for me. I like Hulu's quality and professional videos compared to YouTube's user-submitted ones. These two shouldn't even be compared in the first place.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Amy Cameron&lt;br&gt;&lt;a href="http://BuildMySiteforFree.com" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="BuildMySiteforFree.com"&gt;BuildMySiteforFree.com&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Website free builder</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 30 Apr 2010 23:06:44 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>