<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title>VentureBeat - Latest Comments in Intel&amp;#8217;s Mark Bohr: Look to biology for the future of computing</title><link>http://venturebeat.disqus.com/</link><description>News about Tech, Business and Innovation</description><atom:link href="https://venturebeat.disqus.com/intel8217s_mark_bohr_look_to_biology_for_the_future_of_computing/latest.rss" rel="self"></atom:link><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Mon, 09 Feb 2009 18:56:52 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: Intel&amp;#8217;s Mark Bohr: Look to biology for the future of computing</title><link>http://venturebeat.com/2009/02/09/intels-mark-bohr-look-to-biology-for-the-future-of-computing/#comment-6126179</link><description>&lt;p&gt;The title of this article should be:  The Human Brain Acts Just Like a Computer...Because I Say it Does. &lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">M.P.G.</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 09 Feb 2009 18:56:52 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Intel&amp;#8217;s Mark Bohr: Look to biology for the future of computing</title><link>http://venturebeat.com/2009/02/09/intels-mark-bohr-look-to-biology-for-the-future-of-computing/#comment-6122718</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Thanks for providing this information and really it is very useful.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Flyer Distribution </dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 09 Feb 2009 16:26:02 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Intel&amp;#8217;s Mark Bohr: Look to biology for the future of computing</title><link>http://venturebeat.com/2009/02/09/intels-mark-bohr-look-to-biology-for-the-future-of-computing/#comment-6121929</link><description>&lt;p&gt;This gets me really excited.  I love hearing about how technology is progressing, and it is almost scary to hear him talk about the similarities between a brain and a processor, because if that is the next step we could all be in a lot of trouble with AI.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Matt</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 09 Feb 2009 15:44:56 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Intel&amp;#8217;s Mark Bohr: Look to biology for the future of computing</title><link>http://venturebeat.com/2009/02/09/intels-mark-bohr-look-to-biology-for-the-future-of-computing/#comment-6121375</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Looking forward to more updates from ISSCC..&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">apallix</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 09 Feb 2009 15:26:56 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Intel&amp;#8217;s Mark Bohr: Look to biology for the future of computing</title><link>http://venturebeat.com/2009/02/09/intels-mark-bohr-look-to-biology-for-the-future-of-computing/#comment-6121252</link><description>&lt;p&gt;What Bohr failed to mention (and Jeff Hawkings correctly stressed), is that what makes us more intelligent than computers is our humongous associative memory,  not our computing speed. So if Intel really wants to "emulate nature", they need to focus on memory, not processors&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">PeterA650</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 09 Feb 2009 15:21:35 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>