-
Website
http://venturebeat.com/ -
Original page
http://venturebeat.com/2008/07/21/is-facebooks-redesign-aimed-at-silicon-valley-not-everywhere-else/ -
Subscribe
All Comments -
Community
-
Top Commenters
-
ed hardy
515 comments · 1 points
-
Eric Eldon
349 comments · 13 points
-
edsion007
54 comments · 4 points
-
Haggie
94 comments · 4 points
-
MG Siegler
1126 comments · 30 points
-
-
Popular Threads
-
Does Avatar represent the future of movies? Maybe not
4 hours ago · 3 comments
-
Limelight goes interactive, buys ad agency EyeWonder
2 hours ago · 1 comment
-
Twitter is profitable, says BusinessWeek
7 hours ago · 3 comments
-
The year it exploded: 10 hottest Chinese social games of 2009
7 hours ago · 2 comments
-
Ford to add in-car Wi-Fi option that lets user choose the carrier
5 hours ago · 1 comment
-
Does Avatar represent the future of movies? Maybe not
If you look at the internet, blogs, social networks - all of these tools and technologies were around for years before they went mainstream. What made them go mainstream? It wasn't a change in behaviour; it was a change in the technology which made these easy to do.
SO - yeah, currently many of the the behaviours regarding sharing of content etc is only carried out by early adopters - but that's just because they're ahead of the curve in the technology that allows them to do that, not because they're more prone to sharing than others, or somehow 'more serious' (as though the only serious people in the world are early tech adopters). Millions of people use Facebook, and they've just made it easy to share content - so could be a big step-change about to happen.
nice piece, however, i don't think profile-bling "self-expression" and "river of news about me" news feed info are mutually exclusive content options / trends... just because MySpace emphasizes the former and Facebook emphasizes the latter, doesn't mean that they both aren't zeroing in on respective designs that combine both approaches.
in the future, i bet you'll see both sites/services combining elements of each... as will LinkedIn, Google, and other services as well (in varying degrees)
That's it. I'm starting a social network called MyFace and the main feature is going to be something called the Bling River.
With all that money Fbook has, I'm sure they've spent quite a bit of time/money on usability testing & research to find out what people really want -- which I believe is just photos and news and interaction with friends -- at the end of the day, everything else is just icing (i.e. bling river).
I don't think Twitter or Friendfeed will kill Facebook, nor do I think that by changing Facebook will kill the others. They're different, and I'd like them to stay that way!
The only danger in that being that if that demographic upgrades to full-fledged blogs at some point that slice of users might dwindle. Or grow, hard to say :)
I suspect a lot of the "Giggly vs Serious" split is an age think. FB started out as a social network for college kids, with high school kids right behind. As Danah Boyd's pointed out (and as I see anecdotally) it's close to the only social network used by college-bound middle and upper middle class high school kids who tend to like those giggle apps that seem aimed at 15 year olds.
We adults came on afterwards, when we discovered that the clean interface was actually fine for things like sharing links and self-promotion, provided you put the right privacy settings on certain photos.
And while Twitter is now mostly used to share links to sites like this, I often wonder if we'll soon see it (or the FB status update) used to link to PerezHilton or Us magazine.
Until then, you're right in thinking that FB's new redesign seems to favor the more adult audience. Whether that's what we in the ad industry call "NASCAR Blindness" (e.g. the thought pattern that says "No one I know does this, ergo no one does") or a conscious decision to go after that demo remains to be seen.
My guess is they need to find a deeper level of daily/hourly involvement, which is being proven in TW/FF to win on engagement. The more usage you have, the more you can engage the bling and apps crowd - they will always follow the audience.
Perhaps it's more of a "first things first" approach, not an a vs. b.
my $0.02
So I think they did the right thing; you want your stuff, put it where it belongs, if you're just stopping by to say hi, poke or otherwise write asinine comments on people's status-es, you do it and you're gone!... so you can go to your next victim... I mean, "friend"...
Ciao!!!
So I think they did the right thing; you want your stuff, put it where it belongs, if you're just stopping by to say hi, poke or otherwise write asinine comments on people's status-es, you do it and you're gone!... so you can go to your next victim... I mean, "friend"...
Ciao!!!
http://www.abercrombieshop.us
Since you don't like my angle, tell me why I'm wrong.
Also, I've been using Facebook since 2005.