<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title>VentureBeat - Latest Comments in Microsoft invests $240M in Facebook, as Facebook develops ad product</title><link>http://venturebeat.disqus.com/</link><description>News about Tech, Business and Innovation</description><atom:link href="https://venturebeat.disqus.com/microsoft_invests_240m_in_facebook_as_facebook_develops_ad_product/latest.rss" rel="self"></atom:link><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Wed, 24 Oct 2007 18:24:11 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: Microsoft invests $240M in Facebook, as Facebook develops ad product</title><link>http://venturebeat.com/2007/10/24/microsoft-funds-facebook-as-facebook-develops-ad-product/#comment-14680115</link><description>&lt;p&gt;This is idiocy - if FB is "worth $15 billion", what does this make MySpace worth? News Corporation is obviously undervalued. This is insane for a company trying to figure out how to make money.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">A. Smith</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 24 Oct 2007 18:24:11 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Microsoft invests $240M in Facebook, as Facebook develops ad product</title><link>http://venturebeat.com/2007/10/24/microsoft-funds-facebook-as-facebook-develops-ad-product/#comment-14680114</link><description>&lt;p&gt;i think msft played this one beautifully - the valuation is not important - msft was able to put in a much lower figure in absolute terms, which is not much for them, and capture a measure of influence and control that would otherwise have fallen into the hands of an arch-rival. no problem.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">mathew johnson</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 24 Oct 2007 17:08:02 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>