<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title>VentureBeat - Latest Comments in More betting on visual search: SearchMe raises another $12.6M</title><link>http://venturebeat.disqus.com/</link><description>News about Tech, Business and Innovation</description><atom:link href="https://venturebeat.disqus.com/more_betting_on_visual_search_searchme_raises_another_126m/latest.rss" rel="self"></atom:link><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Thu, 15 Oct 2009 01:47:58 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: More betting on visual search: SearchMe raises another $12.6M</title><link>http://venturebeat.com/2008/05/30/more-betting-on-visual-search-searchme-raises-another-126m/#comment-20099341</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Why tiffany jewellery is your best choice?Compared with other jewellerys,tiffany jewellery have many advantages.&lt;br&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.tiffanyjewelleryshop.co.uk" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="http://www.tiffanyjewelleryshop.co.uk"&gt;http://www.tiffanyjewellery...&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Guest</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 15 Oct 2009 01:47:58 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: More betting on visual search: SearchMe raises another $12.6M</title><link>http://venturebeat.com/2008/05/30/more-betting-on-visual-search-searchme-raises-another-126m/#comment-564236</link><description>&lt;p&gt;You anonymous Disqus user!  Now I have to figure out which Mike D from a long time ago your are.  Are you the Mike D from Sloan or the Mike D from About?  Reveal yourself. :)&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Anyway, I don't disagree with your math, if they can capture a small share of search, there is revenue to be made.  But two issues:&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;1.  Getting to 1% in a visual search model I find to be a challenge&lt;br&gt;2.  At some point, monetization model has to kick in and that means ads if they are going for share.  And going to ads means having to impact the nice, smooth cover-flow design they have.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">loupaglia</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 31 May 2008 16:07:14 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: More betting on visual search: SearchMe raises another $12.6M</title><link>http://venturebeat.com/2008/05/30/more-betting-on-visual-search-searchme-raises-another-126m/#comment-564121</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Reminds me of &lt;a href="http://flowww.com" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="flowww.com"&gt;flowww.com&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Tony Robertson</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 31 May 2008 15:32:58 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: More betting on visual search: SearchMe raises another $12.6M</title><link>http://venturebeat.com/2008/05/30/more-betting-on-visual-search-searchme-raises-another-126m/#comment-563868</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Yo Lou - long time amigo.  While monetization is an issue, I don't think it will be their issue.  They'll probably be a strict technolgoy/talent acquisition long before they start ringing the cash register.  Even if they do crack the code, 1% search share != 1% seach revenue (rounds to zero $).  It's all about scale.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;We did some interviews/concept value test recently and presented Search Me to respondents.  It proves very useful when there's a mass of low authority sites - good design correlates strongly (not perfectly) with good content.  Saves a few trial and error clicks...&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Mike D</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 31 May 2008 14:22:43 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: More betting on visual search: SearchMe raises another $12.6M</title><link>http://venturebeat.com/2008/05/30/more-betting-on-visual-search-searchme-raises-another-126m/#comment-563284</link><description>&lt;p&gt;The problem is, if you grab 1% of the search market, how do you monetize it? By going to Google for ads. If Google doesn't want to deal with you, you are basically screwed. I mean, Yahoo has like 16% or whatever and they are still screwed. &lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">dumbfounder</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 31 May 2008 12:02:07 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: More betting on visual search: SearchMe raises another $12.6M</title><link>http://venturebeat.com/2008/05/30/more-betting-on-visual-search-searchme-raises-another-126m/#comment-562595</link><description>&lt;p&gt;agreed.  i think it is neat and the visualization is nice, but it is simply a slower search tool and I do not think the return is there from Google fast results and clicking through some choices.  I think it is probably a fantastic designer's search engine so you can find views of different ways people are attacking a topic from a  design side.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;looking ahead, I would like to know how SearchMe is going to tackle the money problem.  throwing ads into their engine, even text-based, is going to really hamper that nice clean look they have going.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">loupaglia</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 31 May 2008 07:54:06 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>