<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title>VentureBeat - Latest Comments in Nanosolar follows through on cutting-edge solar technology</title><link>http://venturebeat.disqus.com/</link><description>News about Tech, Business and Innovation</description><atom:link href="https://venturebeat.disqus.com/nanosolar_follows_through_on_cutting_edge_solar_technology/latest.rss" rel="self"></atom:link><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Sun, 11 Mar 2007 04:04:24 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: Nanosolar follows through on cutting-edge solar technology</title><link>http://venturebeat.com/2006/12/12/nanosolar-follows-through-on-cutting-edge-solar-technology/#comment-14670974</link><description>&lt;p&gt;So I have heard alot of talk about breakthroughs and advances in technology, but who is the real leader in the solar business?  Is there any major standards set or independent market research to separate the briliance from the dimwits?&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;I want to get the solar ball rolling and I can't be the only one...&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">David Murgoitio</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 11 Mar 2007 04:04:24 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Nanosolar follows through on cutting-edge solar technology</title><link>http://venturebeat.com/2006/12/12/nanosolar-follows-through-on-cutting-edge-solar-technology/#comment-14670973</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Has anybody anywhere (of scientific repute) conducted an independent test of Nanosolar product?  I don't even mind if it is the normal BS little lab cel of a few square cm, never mind a practically useful module of say half a square meter.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Show me the results of an equovalent IEC global standard test that includes accelerated UV exposure and stress testing for air &amp;amp; humidity penetration of their conductive layer.  Until then this (Nanosolar) is just the same Silicon Valley PR rubbish that gave us companies like Webvan in the 90's.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Macafrican</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 25 Jan 2007 04:05:29 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Nanosolar follows through on cutting-edge solar technology</title><link>http://venturebeat.com/2006/12/12/nanosolar-follows-through-on-cutting-edge-solar-technology/#comment-14670972</link><description>&lt;p&gt;When will we ever see one. Why did Google use Sharp PV system this year instead of being a Beta Site for NanoSolar. I find it hard to believe that the most dramatic breakthrough in alternative energy has not shown real proof that it will exist. I am beginning to doubt that it will ever come about. As a journalist can you do some real investigative reporting and let us know if this is for real and if so when will actually see one.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Thanks,&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Paul Jorgensen&lt;br&gt;Annapolis MD&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Paul Jorgensen</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 14 Jan 2007 22:03:22 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Nanosolar follows through on cutting-edge solar technology</title><link>http://venturebeat.com/2006/12/12/nanosolar-follows-through-on-cutting-edge-solar-technology/#comment-14670971</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Matt, it's time for me to remind you once again that Sanyo, Energy Conversion Devices and Powerfilm have manufactured thin film solar cells for decades.    Nanosolar can't "be first to hit the large-scale manufacturing stage" with thin film solar cells as the race was already over in the 1980's.   ECD/Unisol in particular has made roof tiles that incorporate solar cells for 10 years.    Have you seen solar-powered calculators and watches?   They already use thin-film cells.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Remarks about Nanosolar being a pioneer in thin-film solar cells have appeared on this blog several times now.      Don't believe what I say, check the annual reports of ECD, Sanyo and Powerfilm.   They are all publicly traded companies and information about them is readily available.    Nanosolar's most serious competition doesn't come from other startups but from established solar companies.    Don't get so caught up in the Valley's venture buzz that you forget about older, established companies in the rest of the world!&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Alison Chaiken</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 16 Dec 2006 11:19:09 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Nanosolar follows through on cutting-edge solar technology</title><link>http://venturebeat.com/2006/12/12/nanosolar-follows-through-on-cutting-edge-solar-technology/#comment-14670970</link><description>&lt;p&gt;"company's"....not "country's" current output.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Paul</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 13 Dec 2006 11:10:05 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Nanosolar follows through on cutting-edge solar technology</title><link>http://venturebeat.com/2006/12/12/nanosolar-follows-through-on-cutting-edge-solar-technology/#comment-14670969</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Photovoltaic, especially thin film, will only ever make sense with massive massive subsidies or in remote locations unconnected to the grid&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Daniel Green</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 13 Dec 2006 00:17:08 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>