<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title>VentureBeat - Latest Comments in News Corp scores $900M from Google, a coup</title><link>http://venturebeat.disqus.com/</link><description>News about Tech, Business and Innovation</description><atom:link href="https://venturebeat.disqus.com/news_corp_scores_900m_from_google_a_coup/latest.rss" rel="self"></atom:link><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Tue, 08 Aug 2006 11:38:41 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: News Corp scores $900M from Google, a coup</title><link>http://venturebeat.com/2006/08/07/news-corp-scores-900m-from-google-a-coup/#comment-14666929</link><description>&lt;p&gt;So, what does this mean for other VC-backed upstarts like YouTube and Facebook?&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Dan</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 08 Aug 2006 11:38:41 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: News Corp scores $900M from Google, a coup</title><link>http://venturebeat.com/2006/08/07/news-corp-scores-900m-from-google-a-coup/#comment-14666928</link><description>&lt;p&gt;'It depends on whether MySpace users decide to use the search bar to buy things. Our hunch is they probably are only searching for friends, because that's all we've used the MySpace search for.'&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;I'm sure the Google execs took a look at the current search volume and ad clicks... Currently it's powered by Overture. This is a minimum revenue guarantee too, so it's likely the real amount will be more (especially if MySpace keeps up some growth). Murdoch is looking really smart right now. Making all his money back in a few years.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Jon Gales</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 08 Aug 2006 07:08:48 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: News Corp scores $900M from Google, a coup</title><link>http://venturebeat.com/2006/08/07/news-corp-scores-900m-from-google-a-coup/#comment-14666927</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Ok, the confusion stems from my link to the AP story, which used the $1.2 billion number (which includes the IGn deal), and so that is what I was referring to. I've updated it now, and hope it is finally clear. Sorry about that.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Matt Marshall</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 08 Aug 2006 06:22:28 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: News Corp scores $900M from Google, a coup</title><link>http://venturebeat.com/2006/08/07/news-corp-scores-900m-from-google-a-coup/#comment-14666926</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I thought all of Intermix, including MySpace was $580M.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Dan</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 08 Aug 2006 06:02:08 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: News Corp scores $900M from Google, a coup</title><link>http://venturebeat.com/2006/08/07/news-corp-scores-900m-from-google-a-coup/#comment-14666925</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Let's not confuse profits with revenues and let's not forget about Finance 101: a dollar today is worth more than a dollar tomorrow.  Fox's IRR will be the discounted value of $900MM + the present value of the future cash flows from MySpace, which will be based on MySpace's profitability...Not $900MM + $350MM as you point out.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Elan</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 08 Aug 2006 04:02:28 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: News Corp scores $900M from Google, a coup</title><link>http://venturebeat.com/2006/08/07/news-corp-scores-900m-from-google-a-coup/#comment-14666924</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Updated to make clearer. Thx.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Matt Marshall</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 08 Aug 2006 01:12:56 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: News Corp scores $900M from Google, a coup</title><link>http://venturebeat.com/2006/08/07/news-corp-scores-900m-from-google-a-coup/#comment-14666923</link><description>&lt;p&gt;It was $580m and it was not for myspace - but for a Intermix media that owns myspace, among other properties.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">dave</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 07 Aug 2006 23:39:05 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: News Corp scores $900M from Google, a coup</title><link>http://venturebeat.com/2006/08/07/news-corp-scores-900m-from-google-a-coup/#comment-14666922</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Every report I've read said News Corp paid $580 million for MySpace, not $1.2 billion.  Can you confirm either way?&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Ben Rattray</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 07 Aug 2006 21:09:24 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: News Corp scores $900M from Google, a coup</title><link>http://venturebeat.com/2006/08/07/news-corp-scores-900m-from-google-a-coup/#comment-14666921</link><description>&lt;p&gt;No, that wouldn't be good. Unedited bloggers unite! I've updated. Thanks.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Matt Marshall</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 07 Aug 2006 18:54:49 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: News Corp scores $900M from Google, a coup</title><link>http://venturebeat.com/2006/08/07/news-corp-scores-900m-from-google-a-coup/#comment-14666920</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Uh, I think you mean "billion," not "million."  C'mon Matt, let's not get into the habit of readers actually thinking that bloggers NEED editors...&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">M</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 07 Aug 2006 18:12:31 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>