<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title>VentureBeat - Latest Comments in Nintendo court loss shows patent system at its worst</title><link>http://venturebeat.disqus.com/</link><description>News about Tech, Business and Innovation</description><atom:link href="https://venturebeat.disqus.com/nintendo_court_loss_shows_patent_system_at_its_worst_62/latest.rss" rel="self"></atom:link><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Thu, 04 Feb 2010 03:38:06 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: Nintendo court loss shows patent system at its worst</title><link>http://games.venturebeat.com/2008/05/15/nintendo-court-loss-shows-patent-system-at-its-worst/#comment-32582530</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I think 20 year patents are entirely too long, I mean, how much does the future amount generated from a patent 20 years from now contribute to the present value of the patent compare to the present value of the money you will currently spend for R&amp;amp;D on the product that you have patented? It just doesn't seem like the money generated for a patent twenty years from now will give you much incentive to add a lot of R&amp;amp;D dollars into a product you are developing now being that those dollars are worth a lot more now than the present value of that future amount generated by the patent.&lt;br&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.r4-ds.es" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="http://www.r4-ds.es"&gt;cheap nintendo dsi r4&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">elizadavid</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 04 Feb 2010 03:38:06 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>