-
Website
http://venturebeat.com/ -
Original page
http://venturebeat.com/2006/06/13/oak-raises-record-venture-capital-fund-despite-mediocre-performance/ -
Subscribe
All Comments -
Community
-
Top Commenters
-
ed hardy
515 comments · 1 points
-
Eric Eldon
349 comments · 13 points
-
edsion007
54 comments · 4 points
-
Haggie
94 comments · 4 points
-
MG Siegler
1126 comments · 30 points
-
-
Popular Threads
-
Speed test shocker: AT&T wins Gizmodo’s 12-city 3G megatest
6 hours ago · 3 comments
-
Does Avatar represent the future of movies? Maybe not
10 hours ago · 4 comments
-
In a year of layoffs, game employment rises slightly in North America
4 hours ago · 1 comment
-
2010’s hottest contenders: 8 products to watch
4 hours ago · 1 comment
-
Game startups raised $600.5 million in 2009, down 36 percent
9 hours ago · 2 comments
-
Speed test shocker: AT&T wins Gizmodo’s 12-city 3G megatest
Now what puzzles me even more than the fact that underperforming VCs can raise such huge amounts is the following: Back in 2000 I forecasted that we will see a VC bubble burst as well. Interestingly, and to me not fully understandable, is the fact that while consolidation went on in the startup scene it had -in total terms- no real impact on the VC community. We still have -even more- VCs around than back in 2000 I think. For sure none of the dotcom like bubble burst happened. Why is that? Are VCs only demanding tough decissions from their invested startups but face themself no performance related evaluation from their investors? It raises my eyebrowes and obviously we have a case where certain control mechanism are out of order!
1) Oak is going to later stage, so it is arguing, with some success, that its early-stage record -- to which you allude above -- is not relevant
2) GPs are brand-happy right now, and Oak has a brand.
3) Mezz investing is a hot asset class right now, and there are relatively few strong brands.