<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title>VentureBeat - Latest Comments in Report: Web 2.0 investments took a dive in Q3</title><link>http://venturebeat.disqus.com/</link><description>News about Tech, Business and Innovation</description><atom:link href="https://venturebeat.disqus.com/report_web_20_investments_took_a_dive_in_q3/latest.rss" rel="self"></atom:link><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Sat, 08 Nov 2008 20:41:29 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: Report: Web 2.0 investments took a dive in Q3</title><link>http://venturebeat.com/2008/11/07/venturesource-web-20-investments-took-a-dive/#comment-3639496</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Very informative, i personally dont see all the hype in web 2.0&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Career</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 08 Nov 2008 20:41:29 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Report: Web 2.0 investments took a dive in Q3</title><link>http://venturebeat.com/2008/11/07/venturesource-web-20-investments-took-a-dive/#comment-3628290</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Web 2.0 hasn't produced any exits to speak of. It also has a very low barrier to entry and thus low capitalization needs. VCs don't even look at this stuff anymore, and rightfully so.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Peter Antypas</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 08 Nov 2008 17:54:14 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Report: Web 2.0 investments took a dive in Q3</title><link>http://venturebeat.com/2008/11/07/venturesource-web-20-investments-took-a-dive/#comment-3628011</link><description>&lt;p&gt;If  a firm is going to invest which type of company are they most likely going to invest within?  &lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Sean Conway</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 08 Nov 2008 17:20:25 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>