<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title>VentureBeat - Latest Comments in ReputationDefender raises $2.6M to protect your good name</title><link>http://venturebeat.disqus.com/</link><description>News about Tech, Business and Innovation</description><atom:link href="https://venturebeat.disqus.com/reputationdefender_raises_26m_to_protect_your_good_name/latest.rss" rel="self"></atom:link><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Thu, 17 May 2012 11:06:43 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: ReputationDefender raises $2.6M to protect your good name</title><link>http://venturebeat.com/2008/08/29/reputationdefender-raises-26m-to-protect-your-good-name/#comment-531199844</link><description>&lt;p&gt; so expensive for your reputation, but this border with the cost of what you get&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">iklan rumah dijual</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 17 May 2012 11:06:43 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: ReputationDefender raises $2.6M to protect your good name</title><link>http://venturebeat.com/2008/08/29/reputationdefender-raises-26m-to-protect-your-good-name/#comment-199293690</link><description>&lt;p&gt; @LocalSearchPlus since its 2011 it would be interesting to see (verify) how effective RD has faired in the marketplace. Many of our SMB clients are trying to figure out how to protect their online repuation and how this impacts their Google Places listing.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Guest</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 07 May 2011 09:26:10 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: ReputationDefender raises $2.6M to protect your good name</title><link>http://venturebeat.com/2008/08/29/reputationdefender-raises-26m-to-protect-your-good-name/#comment-130165260</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Online reputation defense is only as good as the company. How do they actually do this? Anyone has any first hand experience of being a client of any of the companies mentioned? &lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Joan</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 17 Jan 2011 14:00:48 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: ReputationDefender raises $2.6M to protect your good name</title><link>http://venturebeat.com/2008/08/29/reputationdefender-raises-26m-to-protect-your-good-name/#comment-129329904</link><description>&lt;p&gt;WOW, that's great if it really does what it promises!&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">remove disk optimizer </dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 15 Jan 2011 02:18:37 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: ReputationDefender raises $2.6M to protect your good name</title><link>http://venturebeat.com/2008/08/29/reputationdefender-raises-26m-to-protect-your-good-name/#comment-80082411</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Reputation Defender is a great product when your reputation or your teenage daughters is intentionally dragged through the mud for no reason.  Trust me it happens in teen world.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Here is a good place to compare LifeLock, TrustedID and Debix... the mentioned companies that offer protection from a different threat... Identity Theft. &lt;br&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.identitytheftlabs.com" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="http://www.identitytheftlabs.com"&gt;http://www.identitytheftlab...&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">LuckyLinda7</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 22 Sep 2010 13:04:39 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: ReputationDefender raises $2.6M to protect your good name</title><link>http://venturebeat.com/2008/08/29/reputationdefender-raises-26m-to-protect-your-good-name/#comment-47157916</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Reputation Defender approached us in a very nice manner, did not threaten us with a lawsuit, instead we were kindly asked to understand the difficult situation&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Wheels For Sale</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 28 Apr 2010 04:04:08 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: ReputationDefender raises $2.6M to protect your good name</title><link>http://venturebeat.com/2008/08/29/reputationdefender-raises-26m-to-protect-your-good-name/#comment-27659058</link><description>&lt;p&gt;best of luck for 2010&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">imrani</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 31 Dec 2009 08:44:57 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: ReputationDefender raises $2.6M to protect your good name</title><link>http://venturebeat.com/2008/08/29/reputationdefender-raises-26m-to-protect-your-good-name/#comment-20021724</link><description>&lt;p&gt;British law student sues Abercrombie-Fitch for disability discrimination.&lt;br&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.abercrombieonsale.co.uk" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="http://www.abercrombieonsale.co.uk"&gt;http://www.abercrombieonsal...&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Guest</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 14 Oct 2009 02:25:41 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: ReputationDefender raises $2.6M to protect your good name</title><link>http://venturebeat.com/2008/08/29/reputationdefender-raises-26m-to-protect-your-good-name/#comment-8177157</link><description>&lt;p&gt;This company is so worthless. Save the money and put yourself on LinkedIn for free. Forget paying Michael Fertik and his friends to do it for you.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Ben Smith</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 14 Apr 2009 01:20:20 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: ReputationDefender raises $2.6M to protect your good name</title><link>http://venturebeat.com/2008/08/29/reputationdefender-raises-26m-to-protect-your-good-name/#comment-2640979</link><description>&lt;p&gt;You can do the exact same thing, sans the remediation, at &lt;a href="http://www.pipl.com" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="www.pipl.com"&gt;www.pipl.com&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Other than them removing the unwanted material, I don't see much value in this.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Nick</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 26 Sep 2008 10:30:31 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: ReputationDefender raises $2.6M to protect your good name</title><link>http://venturebeat.com/2008/08/29/reputationdefender-raises-26m-to-protect-your-good-name/#comment-1974911</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I'm one of the moderators on &lt;a href="http://www.albertastars.com/" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="http://www.albertastars.com/"&gt;Alberta Stars&lt;/a&gt; social network and we were approached by Mr. Dayu Yang from &lt;a href="http://www.albertastars.com/posts.php?forum=4&amp;amp;topic=1201" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="http://www.albertastars.com/posts.php?forum=4&amp;amp;topic=1201"&gt;Reputation Defender&lt;/a&gt; in regards to the &lt;a href="http://www.albertastars.com/posts.php?forum=4&amp;amp;topic=879" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="http://www.albertastars.com/posts.php?forum=4&amp;amp;topic=879"&gt;gruesome pictures of Nikki Catsouras&lt;/a&gt; that were linked from our website. &lt;a href="http://AlbertaStars.com" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="AlbertaStars.com"&gt;AlbertaStars.com&lt;/a&gt; is a community website that respects freedom of speech and member's opinions are not censored, hence it was given out to the public to decide whether we're going to remove the links or retain. Clear consensus has not been reached, hence the images are still linked.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Many of our members believe that thousands of dollars spent on chasing the pictures and getting them removed off the web should have been used for better purpose, perhaps to help educate teenagers better on dangers of reckless driving, which was the reason why Nicole Catsouras' life ended in such a horrific way.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;On a more positive note, Reputation Defender approached us in a very nice manner, did not threaten us with a lawsuit, instead we were kindly asked to understand the difficult situation The Catsouras have been put into by having those pictures published on the web and were asked to consider removal from our site.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Angie</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 01 Sep 2008 04:44:28 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: ReputationDefender raises $2.6M to protect your good name</title><link>http://venturebeat.com/2008/08/29/reputationdefender-raises-26m-to-protect-your-good-name/#comment-1934912</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Unfortunately, it may be used to pressure valid opinions off the web. &lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Beecher Bowers</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 30 Aug 2008 22:24:56 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: ReputationDefender raises $2.6M to protect your good name</title><link>http://venturebeat.com/2008/08/29/reputationdefender-raises-26m-to-protect-your-good-name/#comment-1925409</link><description>&lt;p&gt;their logo looks like govworks' logo. . . hope they don't have the same fate. &lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">cglace</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 30 Aug 2008 02:01:47 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: ReputationDefender raises $2.6M to protect your good name</title><link>http://venturebeat.com/2008/08/29/reputationdefender-raises-26m-to-protect-your-good-name/#comment-1922336</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Brilliant!  A classic FUD market and a huge first-mover advantage that the management team has made the most of with some exclusive deals.  Great work!&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Jimmy S</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 29 Aug 2008 21:32:34 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>