http://venturebeat.disqus.com/News about Tech, Business and InnovationenThu, 07 Jun 2012 01:28:53 -0000http://venturebeat.com/2009/07/27/retweetcom-removes-offending-code-after-tweetmeme-plagiarism-accusations/#comment-549533664<p>Yeah, I also feel the same thing that it is disreputable,<br>it is that movement of value are not copyrightable, only the indicated<br>articles.</p>Website DesignThu, 07 Jun 2012 01:28:53 -0000http://venturebeat.com/2009/07/27/retweetcom-removes-offending-code-after-tweetmeme-plagiarism-accusations/#comment-13417907<p>I would agree that while it definitely rings of being unethical, my gut reaction (not based on any research) is that expressions of code are not copyrightable, only the expressed content.</p>GuestMon, 27 Jul 2009 17:15:05 -0000http://venturebeat.com/2009/07/27/retweetcom-removes-offending-code-after-tweetmeme-plagiarism-accusations/#comment-13417596<p>But I thought we were in the post-copyright era? Shouldn't <a href="http://Retweet.com" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="Retweet.com">Retweet.com</a> be able to use Tweetmeme's code to create a better service?</p>Eo NomineMon, 27 Jul 2009 17:06:38 -0000