-
Website
http://venturebeat.com/ -
Original page
http://venturebeat.com/2008/07/28/review-out-of-the-gate-cuil-is-ambitious-but-flawed/ -
Subscribe
All Comments -
Community
-
Top Commenters
-
ed hardy
515 comments · 1 points
-
Eric Eldon
349 comments · 13 points
-
edsion007
54 comments · 4 points
-
Haggie
94 comments · 4 points
-
MG Siegler
1126 comments · 30 points
-
-
Popular Threads
-
Does Avatar represent the future of movies? Maybe not
3 hours ago · 3 comments
-
Twitter is profitable, says BusinessWeek
5 hours ago · 3 comments
-
The year it exploded: 10 hottest Chinese social games of 2009
5 hours ago · 2 comments
-
Ford to add in-car Wi-Fi option that lets user choose the carrier
3 hours ago · 1 comment
-
Youku.com, Chinese video website, raises $40M
16 hours ago · 3 comments
-
Does Avatar represent the future of movies? Maybe not
"size of the world wide web"
The results are total nonsense. Hence, an "F".
This thing needs lots of work.
/Ira
http://www.miislita.com/information-retrieval-t...
First, the results are not relevant at all. It never retrieves what I am looking for, in the way that Google can.
Two, the images are not necessarily associated with a website. I looked up my website 'Velvet Blues'. And instead of a logo or screen shot, I found an image with Spanish text on it, which came from God knows where! There's nothing about Cuba on my website.
Three, you've ignored the downtime. Somehow, this search engine which was made to serve users, didn't adequately prepare for traffic.
All in all, they made a poor showing, which I blame on a last minute scramble to reach their deadline... If you take a look at Digg or NYT, you'll find that over 90% of the comments are negative. In less than 24 hours of their launch, they've only been successful at one thing: alienating a good portion of their audience.
Relevance of results will be ongoing; you can't expect ANYONE to come out of the gate and match any of the majors, let alone Google.
I do agree with you that the images that are pulled up are frequently irrelevant. Worse still, beyond "anchoring" the page I have NO idea what value they serve to the user.
I do think though that people tend to be overly critical and evaluate search products along irrelevant angles (looking at the number of results per SERP across search engines, for example, which is a pretty lame way to approach the comparison).
So Cuil freely mixes text and images from different sources. I suppose more permutations would mean more results...
http://www.abercrombieonsale.co.uk