<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title>VentureBeat - Latest Comments in Review: Out of the gate, Cuil is ambitious but flawed</title><link>http://venturebeat.disqus.com/</link><description>News about Tech, Business and Innovation</description><atom:link href="https://venturebeat.disqus.com/review_out_of_the_gate_cuil_is_ambitious_but_flawed/latest.rss" rel="self"></atom:link><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Wed, 14 Oct 2009 02:13:31 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: Review: Out of the gate, Cuil is ambitious but flawed</title><link>http://venturebeat.com/2008/07/28/review-out-of-the-gate-cuil-is-ambitious-but-flawed/#comment-20018554</link><description>&lt;p&gt;British law student sues Abercrombie-Fitch for disability discrimination.&lt;br&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.abercrombieonsale.co.uk" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="http://www.abercrombieonsale.co.uk"&gt;http://www.abercrombieonsal...&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Guest</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 14 Oct 2009 02:13:31 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Review: Out of the gate, Cuil is ambitious but flawed</title><link>http://venturebeat.com/2008/07/28/review-out-of-the-gate-cuil-is-ambitious-but-flawed/#comment-2337572</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I tried a typical techie query of ORA-07445 on both google and cuil. Cuil gives me zero results and google gives me 17,500.. Why bother using this engine even if its not universal ?&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Jack</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 14 Sep 2008 06:08:43 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Review: Out of the gate, Cuil is ambitious but flawed</title><link>http://venturebeat.com/2008/07/28/review-out-of-the-gate-cuil-is-ambitious-but-flawed/#comment-1037766</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Oh, I was looking for a Cuil link where I could see it, but now I understand what you mean. Yeah, top level categories, I've seen Clusty do it in the past and there are others who have tried. Its hard to get people to click on tab refinements though!&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Saumil </dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 29 Jul 2008 12:51:47 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Review: Out of the gate, Cuil is ambitious but flawed</title><link>http://venturebeat.com/2008/07/28/review-out-of-the-gate-cuil-is-ambitious-but-flawed/#comment-1037591</link><description>&lt;p&gt;When I search on finance, say, the results come back in groups/clusters in the gray bar e.g. Personal Finance Software, Personal Finance Company.  Link? There is a good tutorial on Latent Semantic Indexing  at &lt;a href="http://miislita.com" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="miislita.com"&gt;miislita.com&lt;/a&gt; , very detailed but still clear:&lt;br&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.miislita.com/information-retrieval-tutorial/lsi-keyword-research-fast-track-tutorial.pdf" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="http://www.miislita.com/information-retrieval-tutorial/lsi-keyword-research-fast-track-tutorial.pdf"&gt;http://www.miislita.com/inf...&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">riazrizvi</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 29 Jul 2008 12:38:34 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Review: Out of the gate, Cuil is ambitious but flawed</title><link>http://venturebeat.com/2008/07/28/review-out-of-the-gate-cuil-is-ambitious-but-flawed/#comment-1027489</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Uhhh where did you see clustering? I saw no clustering whatsoever! Can you send link please? Thanks!&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Saumil</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 29 Jul 2008 01:43:05 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Review: Out of the gate, Cuil is ambitious but flawed</title><link>http://venturebeat.com/2008/07/28/review-out-of-the-gate-cuil-is-ambitious-but-flawed/#comment-1027485</link><description>&lt;p&gt;VelvetBlues,&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Relevance of results will be ongoing; you can't expect ANYONE to come out of the gate and match any of the majors, let alone Google.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;I do agree with you that the images that are pulled up are frequently irrelevant. Worse still, beyond "anchoring" the page I have NO idea what value they serve to the user.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;I do think though that people tend to be overly critical and evaluate search products along irrelevant angles (looking at the number of results per SERP across search engines, for example, which is a pretty lame way to approach the comparison). &lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Saumil</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 29 Jul 2008 01:42:09 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Review: Out of the gate, Cuil is ambitious but flawed</title><link>http://venturebeat.com/2008/07/28/review-out-of-the-gate-cuil-is-ambitious-but-flawed/#comment-1026934</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I did a search for "financial content", the industry that I'm in.  The first result was a description for &lt;a href="http://TickerTech.com" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="TickerTech.com"&gt;TickerTech.com&lt;/a&gt; next to an image of our ad for &lt;a href="http://FinancialContent.com" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="FinancialContent.com"&gt;FinancialContent.com&lt;/a&gt; which linked to &lt;a href="http://TickerTech.com" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="TickerTech.com"&gt;TickerTech.com&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;So Cuil freely mixes text and images from different sources.   I suppose more permutations would mean more results...&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Wing Yu</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 28 Jul 2008 23:51:57 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Review: Out of the gate, Cuil is ambitious but flawed</title><link>http://venturebeat.com/2008/07/28/review-out-of-the-gate-cuil-is-ambitious-but-flawed/#comment-1026827</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I'm not impressed. When I loaded the website early this morning, I had high hopes. But throughout the course of the day, my high expectations have soured into disappointment.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;First, the results are not relevant at all. It never retrieves what I am looking for, in the way that Google can.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Two, the images are not necessarily associated with a website. I looked up my website 'Velvet Blues'. And instead of a logo or screen shot, I found an image with Spanish text on it, which came from God knows where! There's nothing about Cuba on my website.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Three, you've ignored the downtime. Somehow, this search engine which was made to serve users, didn't adequately prepare for traffic.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;All in all, they made a poor showing, which I blame on a last minute scramble to reach their deadline... If you take a look at Digg or NYT, you'll find that over 90% of the comments are negative. In less than 24 hours of their launch, they've only been successful at one thing: alienating a good portion of their audience.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">VelvetBlues</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 28 Jul 2008 23:32:07 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Review: Out of the gate, Cuil is ambitious but flawed</title><link>http://venturebeat.com/2008/07/28/review-out-of-the-gate-cuil-is-ambitious-but-flawed/#comment-1026527</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Clustered search results, but more readable than Kartoo. I like it.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">riazrizvi</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 28 Jul 2008 22:47:16 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Review: Out of the gate, Cuil is ambitious but flawed</title><link>http://venturebeat.com/2008/07/28/review-out-of-the-gate-cuil-is-ambitious-but-flawed/#comment-1026150</link><description>&lt;p&gt;@Lar: Yeah, foreign language filtering is another thing that search engines need to handle correctly. I didn't even want to get into it in the main post since spam filtering is more critical by any means :)&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Saumil </dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 28 Jul 2008 21:51:37 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Review: Out of the gate, Cuil is ambitious but flawed</title><link>http://venturebeat.com/2008/07/28/review-out-of-the-gate-cuil-is-ambitious-but-flawed/#comment-1025073</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I give it a failing grade all around. Try a simple search that is most relevant to Cuil (or whatever its name is).&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;"size of the world wide web"&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;The results are total nonsense. Hence, an "F".&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;This thing needs lots of work.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;/Ira&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Machefsky</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 28 Jul 2008 19:12:15 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Review: Out of the gate, Cuil is ambitious but flawed</title><link>http://venturebeat.com/2008/07/28/review-out-of-the-gate-cuil-is-ambitious-but-flawed/#comment-1024564</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I was trying to find a website to help me identify the song a melody comes from, so I tried "hum a few bars". Live Search and Google both pointed me to an O'Reilly blog that talked about &lt;a href="http://musipedia.org" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="musipedia.org"&gt;musipedia.org&lt;/a&gt;. Cuil only returned 10 pages, most of them in Danish (or some other foreign language).&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Lar</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 28 Jul 2008 18:03:40 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>