<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title>VentureBeat - Latest Comments in RockYou says it&amp;#8217;s rocking Slide, but both face trouble</title><link>http://venturebeat.disqus.com/</link><description>News about Tech, Business and Innovation</description><atom:link href="https://venturebeat.disqus.com/rockyou_says_it8217s_rocking_slide_but_both_face_trouble/latest.rss" rel="self"></atom:link><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Fri, 14 Sep 2007 22:10:42 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: RockYou says it&amp;#8217;s rocking Slide, but both face trouble</title><link>http://venturebeat.com/2007/05/15/rockyou-says-its-rocking-slide-but-both-face-trouble/#comment-14675131</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Great site!i&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">fox</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 14 Sep 2007 22:10:42 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: RockYou says it&amp;#8217;s rocking Slide, but both face trouble</title><link>http://venturebeat.com/2007/05/15/rockyou-says-its-rocking-slide-but-both-face-trouble/#comment-14675130</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Slide and RockYou are totally worthless companies.  Myspace should pull the plug on them fast.  Entrepreneurs are supposed to solve real problems - not create a widget that hopes to one day monetize by stealing someone else's traffic.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Jay (living in First Life)</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 17 May 2007 11:39:15 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: RockYou says it&amp;#8217;s rocking Slide, but both face trouble</title><link>http://venturebeat.com/2007/05/15/rockyou-says-its-rocking-slide-but-both-face-trouble/#comment-14675129</link><description>&lt;p&gt;strategically speaking, investing in a widget based service, is like investing in a pilot fish; at best it gets to eat the scraps of the shark; at worst, the shark get hungry.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">lemon obrien</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 16 May 2007 21:40:41 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: RockYou says it&amp;#8217;s rocking Slide, but both face trouble</title><link>http://venturebeat.com/2007/05/15/rockyou-says-its-rocking-slide-but-both-face-trouble/#comment-14675128</link><description>&lt;p&gt;For RockYou, onsite traffic represents only a subset of all widgets created.  RockYou offers API's to partners sites for creating widgets through an iframe. Partners can offer their users an in-page creation experience.  See Tagged or Flixster for examples.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Lance</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 16 May 2007 10:37:57 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: RockYou says it&amp;#8217;s rocking Slide, but both face trouble</title><link>http://venturebeat.com/2007/05/15/rockyou-says-its-rocking-slide-but-both-face-trouble/#comment-14675127</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Perhaps it's a stretch, but it's interesting to see Max Levchin repeat history in which his firm (Slide/Paypal) is both an asset and a potential thorn in the side to it's virtual host (MySpace/eBay). Try as they might, eBay could not snuff PayPal even with their own acquired alternative and ultimately had to shell out the big bucks. Difference this time is that I don't one can argue that Slide carries anywhere near the strategic imposition to MySpace that PayPal did to eBay.  So I can't imagine we'd see the same game of 'acquisition chicken' between MySpace and Slide.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Blake </dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 16 May 2007 02:13:56 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>