<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title>VentureBeat - Latest Comments in Search: Another way for Facebook to steal Twitter&amp;#8217;s thunder without becoming Twitter?</title><link>http://venturebeat.disqus.com/</link><description>News about Tech, Business and Innovation</description><atom:link href="https://venturebeat.disqus.com/search_another_way_for_facebook_to_steal_twitter8217s_thunder_without_becoming_twitter/latest.rss" rel="self"></atom:link><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Wed, 17 Jun 2009 18:03:34 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: Search: Another way for Facebook to steal Twitter&amp;#8217;s thunder without becoming Twitter?</title><link>http://digital.venturebeat.com/2009/06/17/search-another-way-for-facebook-to-steal-twitters-thunder-without-becoming-twitter/#comment-11064320</link><description>&lt;p&gt;... Which is why facebook should find a way to allow people to have a public identity separate from the private one. For example, if i could login to this blog through facebook  Connect using my Company page as identity, people would be taken to my company page when they click on my name and be able to become fans. That is exactly twitter, only a lot more powerful and versatile.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;As much as i like twitter's content, the twitter site is a whole disappointment, technology-wise. It's 2009, we are not supposed to have things as '140 char limit' or 'daily api requests limit' . I wonder what are these guys doing with the millions they raised? Facebook on the other hands keeps advancing its technology some times more often than it should. And, for the record, let's not forget who launched the 'news feed' first. &lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">10things.me</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 17 Jun 2009 18:03:34 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>