<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title>VentureBeat - Latest Comments in Study: Social networks are actually pretty safe for kids</title><link>http://venturebeat.disqus.com/</link><description>News about Tech, Business and Innovation</description><atom:link href="https://venturebeat.disqus.com/study_social_networks_are_actually_pretty_safe_for_kids/latest.rss" rel="self"></atom:link><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Tue, 19 Feb 2008 21:15:19 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: Study: Social networks are actually pretty safe for kids</title><link>http://venturebeat.com/2008/02/19/study-social-networks-are-actually-pretty-safe-for-kids/#comment-14682927</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I agree that MySpace and Facebook have taken a disproportionate share of the blame; that is what happens when you are the big elephant in the room. However, as industry leaders, they should lead by example. &lt;br&gt;There are no substitutes for good parenting, but social media companies need to realize that  many parents don't "get" technology. Therefore, they should provide easy-to-use tools for parents to keep track of their children's online activities.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">mschmulen</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 19 Feb 2008 21:15:19 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Study: Social networks are actually pretty safe for kids</title><link>http://venturebeat.com/2008/02/19/study-social-networks-are-actually-pretty-safe-for-kids/#comment-14682926</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I think parents play a large role in making sure that their kids are safe online, and often the burden/responsibility is thrown at Social Networks too easily.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Benoit</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 19 Feb 2008 18:49:24 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>