<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title>VentureBeat - Latest Comments in TechCrunch editor defaults in libel case by former employee</title><link>http://venturebeat.disqus.com/</link><description>News about Tech, Business and Innovation</description><atom:link href="https://venturebeat.disqus.com/techcrunch_editor_defaults_in_libel_case_by_former_employee/latest.rss" rel="self"></atom:link><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Tue, 11 Aug 2009 16:52:34 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: TechCrunch editor defaults in libel case by former employee</title><link>http://venturebeat.com/2009/08/03/techcrunch-editor-defaults-in-libel-case-by-former-employee/#comment-14656029</link><description>&lt;p&gt;There's a downside to it, but I appreciate a journalist who's not trying to make friends through his site. Love him or hate him, you can't help but go back to TC.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Jake Owens</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 11 Aug 2009 16:52:34 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: TechCrunch editor defaults in libel case by former employee</title><link>http://venturebeat.com/2009/08/03/techcrunch-editor-defaults-in-libel-case-by-former-employee/#comment-13860206</link><description>&lt;p&gt;these unsubstantiated attacks by techcrunch seem to be part of a pattern. see this article and their correction, after they accused, without proof, a sequoia vc in china of effectively being a criminal&lt;br&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.techcrunch.com/2009/05/15/is-sequoia-china-in-trouble/" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="http://www.techcrunch.com/2009/05/15/is-sequoia-china-in-trouble/"&gt;http://www.techcrunch.com/2...&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Guest</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 03 Aug 2009 21:56:14 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: TechCrunch editor defaults in libel case by former employee</title><link>http://venturebeat.com/2009/08/03/techcrunch-editor-defaults-in-libel-case-by-former-employee/#comment-13857063</link><description>&lt;p&gt;As is always the case, the only way to effect a genuine impact upon someone like Arrington is through their pocket book.  The courts needs to extract a significant pound of flesh...errr funds...in this case to get the legal point across.  What strikes me as even more strange is the fan like awe and fascination with which this poster writes about someone who is obviously a flaming a^^hole.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Arrington...whatever</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 03 Aug 2009 20:16:27 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: TechCrunch editor defaults in libel case by former employee</title><link>http://venturebeat.com/2009/08/03/techcrunch-editor-defaults-in-libel-case-by-former-employee/#comment-13841445</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Yup. Arrington has really started to become a tough guy to read and follow. He really wears a badge of self entitlement. All the judge has to do is look at the ways he responds to his customers in the forums. &lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Moses</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 03 Aug 2009 13:13:34 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>