<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title>VentureBeat - Latest Comments in The Black Hat Tax on consumer Internet businesses</title><link>http://venturebeat.disqus.com/</link><description>News about Tech, Business and Innovation</description><atom:link href="https://venturebeat.disqus.com/the_black_hat_tax_on_consumer_internet_businesses/latest.rss" rel="self"></atom:link><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Fri, 13 Oct 2006 16:43:17 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: The Black Hat Tax on consumer Internet businesses</title><link>http://venturebeat.com/2006/08/29/auren-hoffman-the-black-hat-tax-on-consumer-internet-businesses/#comment-14667210</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I felt good about this post.   It confirmed for me some of the things Iâ€™ve been thinking about.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">hat</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 13 Oct 2006 16:43:17 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: The Black Hat Tax on consumer Internet businesses</title><link>http://venturebeat.com/2006/08/29/auren-hoffman-the-black-hat-tax-on-consumer-internet-businesses/#comment-14667209</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Reminds me of the USA cryptography export rules.  Working at a company in the 80's to mid 90's where it would take 2-3 months for the application and approval process to merely send a data sheet of our product outside the country (even to the UK where our largest competitor was based).&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;We always figured the cost was 20-25% of our overhead (design impacts, multiple versions of the same product, export control clerks and processes, etc.).&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Obviously the bigggest difference here, is that our problem was eventually minimized by reducing goverment regulation.  There is no single obvious solution for the problems causing this resource drain.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">seaan</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 05 Sep 2006 15:02:43 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: The Black Hat Tax on consumer Internet businesses</title><link>http://venturebeat.com/2006/08/29/auren-hoffman-the-black-hat-tax-on-consumer-internet-businesses/#comment-14667208</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Auren - Nice summary of a complex situation although you also should note how companies who have PPC revenue shares (like Google) get HUGE short term cash benefits from fraudulent clicking.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Joseph Hunkins</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 01 Sep 2006 12:55:56 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: The Black Hat Tax on consumer Internet businesses</title><link>http://venturebeat.com/2006/08/29/auren-hoffman-the-black-hat-tax-on-consumer-internet-businesses/#comment-14667207</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Excellent article.  Thank you.  Its definitely a tax and its very, very real.  I write about my personal experiences with this here:&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="http://fuzzyblog.com/archives/2006/08/31/the-blackhat-tax/" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="http://fuzzyblog.com/archives/2006/08/31/the-blackhat-tax/"&gt;http://fuzzyblog.com/archiv...&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Scott Johnson of FuzzyBlog, Oo</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 31 Aug 2006 06:44:32 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>