DISQUS

VentureBeat: TheUnFunded asks entrepreneurs: You can dish it out, but can you take it?

  • Chris Mancini · 1 year ago
    It scares me that VC's could be posting negative comments on my performance. You cannot tell me that if I do a smashup job they will post it on there, but if I am overly nervous and bomb it, I bet I would be on the site in less than 15 minutes.

    It is comparable to being blacklisted on Google's search listings, there is quite a bit at risk.

    Chris Mancini
    http://www.propertystampede.com
  • Anthony Ha · 1 year ago
    Chris: Did you read our disclaimer?
  • anthropocentric · 1 year ago
    April Fools. What VC would do this?
  • Mark Bao · 1 year ago
    TechCrunch has been perpetuating several April Fools items, including their own. They got me with this one.

    Have to say, though, very convincing.
  • Anthony Ha · 1 year ago
    Mark -- Yeah, it's one of those things that seems really unconvincing in retrospect, yet I spent a decent portion of the afternoon talking about it with other VentureBeat writers and putting this article together.

    Oops.
  • Marc Fawzi · 1 year ago
    @Anthony:

    You wrote: "April Fools. What VC would do this?"

    VCs and IPO underwriters always talk to each other before hiring a CEO to take a company public or funding some startup.

    There is in fact a Virtual "The UnFunded" going on email channels.

    ')
  • Marc Fawzi · 1 year ago
    Correction: my reply was a follow up to anthropocentric not Anthony.

    And I guess I need to clarify that what I was referring to falls under "reference checking" not defaming, i.e. candid but not demeaning.

    :)
  • Jason · 1 year ago
    I think this site could easily backfire for VCs. I doubt that VCs would openly discuss entrepreneurs on such a website.

    If you ever had the privilege of having some more behind-the-curtain encounters with some of the very best VCs, you would know that the very best are very secretive (especially among their peers) about their encounters. Rarely have I heard of a VC signing on a deal because of good reputation from another VC (why didn't that VC invest in that idea then himself?).

    Remember how arrogant Larry and Sergey were when they pitched Google? Remember how many VCs turned them down before they got their first round of capital? VCs never regret turning down a bad idea, but they do regret turning down great opportunities. If this site keeps track of such mistakes, I bet there are a lot of investors (LPs that is) who would want a database of that. Even better if VCs offer that information themselves.

    Depending on the amount of comments, I would also assume that the whole image of VCs always being so super busy and engaged about their portfolio companies would change. I would take it as a red flag should a VC tell me that he was late for a meeting because he had to write his comments on theunfunded.com.

    It is not in a VC's interest to burn bridges with any entrepreneur. The opposite is actually the case. Who knows? Maybe the entrepreneurs need a second funding later on or maybe they changed their idea and are on to something big?

    So, after all, a nice April's Fool's joke, but if you had a clearer mindset about the real landscape you would have probably identified that joke earlier (no offense VentureBeat, TC had me on this as well for some minutes :-)
  • Anthony Ha · 1 year ago
    Jason -- Fair enough. But if I've learned one thing at VentureBeat, it's this: Even if an idea is stupid, it might still get funding.
  • Chris Mancini · 1 year ago
    @anthony - I cannot believe I did not notice that disclaimer at the bottom...I feel like an idiot...

    Chris
  • Anthony Ha · 1 year ago
    @Chris You're not the only one.