<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title>VentureBeat - Latest Comments in Google&amp;#8217;s subsidized child day care not as good as it used to be?</title><link>http://venturebeat.disqus.com/</link><description>News about Tech, Business and Innovation</description><atom:link href="https://venturebeat.disqus.com/thread_106/latest.rss" rel="self"></atom:link><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Tue, 25 May 2010 15:15:49 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: Google&amp;#8217;s subsidized child day care not as good as it used to be?</title><link>http://venturebeat.com/2008/07/05/googles-subsidized-child-day-care-not-as-good-as-it-used-to-be/#comment-51996490</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Wasn't Google taken over by someone new recently? If it was I think they're stupid. Why do these internet domains cost so much??? It's just the www! Uggghh... &lt;a href="http://myspace.com/beautifulheroine" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="myspace.com/beautifulheroine"&gt;myspace.com/beautifulheroine&lt;/a&gt; &amp;lt;3 &lt;a href="http://twitter.com/YerAngelOfMusic" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="twitter.com/YerAngelOfMusic"&gt;twitter.com/YerAngelOfMusic&lt;/a&gt; &amp;lt;3 ask questions and get my lame ass yet sometimes helpful answers (:&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Alexia Anast</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 25 May 2010 15:15:49 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Google&amp;#8217;s subsidized child day care not as good as it used to be?</title><link>http://venturebeat.com/2008/07/05/googles-subsidized-child-day-care-not-as-good-as-it-used-to-be/#comment-20098852</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Why tiffany jewellery is your best choice?Compared with other jewellerys,tiffany jewellery have many advantages.&lt;br&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.tiffanyjewelleryshop.co.uk" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="http://www.tiffanyjewelleryshop.co.uk"&gt;http://www.tiffanyjewellery...&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Guest</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 15 Oct 2009 01:30:44 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Google&amp;#8217;s subsidized child day care not as good as it used to be?</title><link>http://venturebeat.com/2008/07/05/googles-subsidized-child-day-care-not-as-good-as-it-used-to-be/#comment-822722</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Google is definitely a company for the young and single. They also don't pay all that well in terms of salaries, but they have been making that up in perks, benefits and the  "coolness" factor.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;I would say this is a sign that our love affair with Google has entered its seven year itch.&lt;br&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Peter Antypas</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 06 Jul 2008 13:53:08 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Google&amp;#8217;s subsidized child day care not as good as it used to be?</title><link>http://venturebeat.com/2008/07/05/googles-subsidized-child-day-care-not-as-good-as-it-used-to-be/#comment-819284</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I can't help thinking if the company wants to save money, seems like they have an unusual number of jumbo jets they could consider dumping.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;I think the article had it right: this isn't free M&amp;amp;Ms and a massage--this is a mandatory item for anyone with kids, and a big area of concern for parents who are also employees. Keeping the gourmet lunches, but forcing the employees to pay for day care (overpriced day care), demonstrates that Google is only interested in the young and single, who can be burned out and then trashed.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Shelley Powers</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 05 Jul 2008 15:49:07 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>