<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title>VentureBeat - Latest Comments in http://venturebeat.com/2009/03/03/104531/</title><link>http://venturebeat.disqus.com/</link><description>News about Tech, Business and Innovation</description><atom:link href="https://venturebeat.disqus.com/thread_41290/latest.rss" rel="self"></atom:link><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Tue, 03 Mar 2009 12:25:28 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: http://venturebeat.com/2009/03/03/104531/</title><link>http://venturebeat.com/2009/03/03/104531/#comment-6842311</link><description>&lt;p&gt;At first I read this and got pretty excited thinking Eye-Fi had changed over to using actual GPS to geotag photos (as it seems to indicate in this article).  However, I checked over on Eye-Fi's site (&lt;a href="http://www.eye.fi/services/geotagging/)" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="http://www.eye.fi/services/geotagging/)"&gt;http://www.eye.fi/services/...&lt;/a&gt; and it seems like the new batch of cards still uses Wi-Fi triangulation to guess your approximate location (which is fine when you're in an area that has a wireless access point).  I guess I'll have to wait a bit longer before I can take one of these cards to the Amazon and automatically geotag my photos.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Rick Henrikson</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 03 Mar 2009 12:25:28 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>