-
Website
http://venturebeat.com/ -
Original page
http://venturebeat.com/2008/07/28/trueanthem-raises-2-million-to-pollute-music-with-pre-song-ads/ -
Subscribe
All Comments -
Community
-
Top Commenters
-
ed hardy
515 comments · 1 points
-
Eric Eldon
349 comments · 13 points
-
edsion007
54 comments · 4 points
-
Haggie
94 comments · 4 points
-
MG Siegler
1126 comments · 30 points
-
-
Popular Threads
-
Youku.com, Chinese video website, raises $40M
12 hours ago · 4 comments
-
Why is porn one of the top terms in web searches by kids?
23 hours ago · 4 comments
-
With Khosla’s backing, Lookout aims to beef up mobile security
9 hours ago · 1 comment
-
The future of mobile: Q&A with GetJar CEO Ilja Laurs
11 hours ago · 1 comment
-
MIT breaks new ground in gesture control
10 hours ago · 1 comment
-
Youku.com, Chinese video website, raises $40M
If a consumer wants music for free but is unwilling to steal it makes fantastic sense!
How did we get to a place where fans, who supposedly adore musicians, feel just fine stealing their music?
If everyone feels okay about stealing from musicians then trueAnthem might just be 100% right-on about where the future is heading…
How long before YouTube videos all play a commercial before starting? Think about it.
Your argument about the ads not being able to be clicked is kind of flacid as well. You can't click on a television or radio commercial either that doesn't mean that it's not effective. Just because this is new media doesn't mean that you have to throw all old media sensibilities away on everything.
More importantly, when it's no trouble at all to find tons of free music that doesn't require you to pay a "small price" every time you hear it, what do you think people will do? And I'd be willing to bet that the percentage of people who are willing and able to use an audio editor to not pay this "small price," is below 1%.
As to your point about the flaccidity of my point about clicks: take a quick look at the trends that are shaping the advertising industry right now: The money is moving online and fast. The major reasons? A. It seems to work better. B. It offers clearly measurable metrics.
Radio commercials effective? Not the last time I checked.
See this is the type of thinking that has the music industry in trouble. The marketers and the psychologists are not the people illegally downloading music. Sure to an older generation this would be horrible... but again, it's NOT FOR YOU.
Why is that so hard to comprehend? Today's youth have more information tossed at them than ever and their attention spans are much shorter because of it. It's not such a bad way to get the actually listen to ads.
Trying to suppress technology is a loser's game, especially in an information economy. The music industry got into trouble because the economics changed and rendered its standard models obsolete.
It's not understanding this fact that keeps it in trouble.
I find it's a great compromise, and although you say that there are lots of other places to find streaming music, i think what internet does is bring fans and bands closer: as they do, fans will realize that listening to a 3-second spot is a small price to pay to support the bands that they are discovering.
TV producers and writers make money from advertising... no reason creative songwriters need to be 'above' making money. Last time I checked... the record-selling business was in the toilet. I prefer my favorite bands to not be homeless, or working at Starbucks. Its simple... Pay them, they'll continue making art.
http://www.edhardysell.com