<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title>VentureBeat - Latest Comments in Twitter study finds more lurkers than active users</title><link>http://venturebeat.disqus.com/</link><description>News about Tech, Business and Innovation</description><atom:link href="https://venturebeat.disqus.com/twitter_study_finds_more_lurkers_than_active_users/latest.rss" rel="self"></atom:link><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Thu, 11 Jun 2009 05:58:16 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: Twitter study finds more lurkers than active users</title><link>http://venturebeat.com/2009/06/10/twitter-study-finds-the-newbs-have-taken-over/#comment-10732688</link><description>&lt;p&gt;From the millions of users the number of spammers should be subtracted.&lt;br&gt;From the millions of tweets, the number of spam messages should be subtracted.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Any one left over besides a handful of leaders posting Tweets?&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">LEADSExplorer</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 11 Jun 2009 05:58:16 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Twitter study finds more lurkers than active users</title><link>http://venturebeat.com/2009/06/10/twitter-study-finds-the-newbs-have-taken-over/#comment-10701188</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I follow several Twitter lurkers... my friends aren't very talkative. Lamers!&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Reuben D. Rock</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 10 Jun 2009 12:07:42 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Twitter study finds more lurkers than active users</title><link>http://venturebeat.com/2009/06/10/twitter-study-finds-the-newbs-have-taken-over/#comment-10699478</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Plurk is much more fun than twitter, for me, twitter is just for gathering info, plurk is for exchanging idea.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">archit</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 10 Jun 2009 11:24:37 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Twitter study finds more lurkers than active users</title><link>http://venturebeat.com/2009/06/10/twitter-study-finds-the-newbs-have-taken-over/#comment-10699420</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I am happy to remain one of those who still don't see the light.  It's text messaging to groups.  Personal spam.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Brainless Centrist</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 10 Jun 2009 11:23:25 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Twitter study finds more lurkers than active users</title><link>http://venturebeat.com/2009/06/10/twitter-study-finds-the-newbs-have-taken-over/#comment-10698743</link><description>&lt;p&gt;These are interesting numbers, but I put some of the recent Twitter stats we're seeing in perspective here, &lt;a href="http://bit.ly/rDgmp" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="http://bit.ly/rDgmp"&gt;http://bit.ly/rDgmp&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Nicholas E. Barron</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 10 Jun 2009 11:04:29 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Twitter study finds more lurkers than active users</title><link>http://venturebeat.com/2009/06/10/twitter-study-finds-the-newbs-have-taken-over/#comment-10697418</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Great stats on Twitter.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Matthew Cook</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 10 Jun 2009 10:29:41 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>