<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title>VentureBeat - Latest Comments in Valley in merger fever: Google looks at SimplyHired? | VentureBeat</title><link>http://venturebeat.disqus.com/</link><description>News about Tech, Business and Innovation</description><atom:link href="https://venturebeat.disqus.com/valley_in_merger_fever_google_looks_at_simplyhired/latest.rss" rel="self"></atom:link><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Mon, 07 May 2007 05:00:33 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: Valley in merger fever: Google looks at SimplyHired? | VentureBeat</title><link>http://venturebeat.com/2007/05/04/valley-in-merger-fever-google-looks-at-simplyhired/#comment-14674750</link><description>&lt;p&gt;My opinion here : &lt;a href="http://altaide.typepad.com/jacques_froissant_altade/2007/05/simplyhired_rac.html" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="http://altaide.typepad.com/jacques_froissant_altade/2007/05/simplyhired_rac.html"&gt;http://altaide.typepad.com/...&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Jacques Froissant (CEO Altaïde</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 07 May 2007 05:00:33 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Valley in merger fever: Google looks at SimplyHired? | VentureBeat</title><link>http://venturebeat.com/2007/05/04/valley-in-merger-fever-google-looks-at-simplyhired/#comment-14674749</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I cut out the offending link from the comment, i'll think about elimination going forward. Also, corrected link to Craigslist.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Thx.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Matt Marshall</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 07 May 2007 02:24:11 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Valley in merger fever: Google looks at SimplyHired? | VentureBeat</title><link>http://venturebeat.com/2007/05/04/valley-in-merger-fever-google-looks-at-simplyhired/#comment-14674748</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Please check the link posted for Craigslist.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Kevin</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 07 May 2007 01:22:18 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Valley in merger fever: Google looks at SimplyHired? | VentureBeat</title><link>http://venturebeat.com/2007/05/04/valley-in-merger-fever-google-looks-at-simplyhired/#comment-14674747</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Matt, any chance you can eliminate links in the comments?  It seems to result in people offering trite comments in order to promote their sites...&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Wen</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 06 May 2007 21:42:14 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Valley in merger fever: Google looks at SimplyHired? | VentureBeat</title><link>http://venturebeat.com/2007/05/04/valley-in-merger-fever-google-looks-at-simplyhired/#comment-14674746</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Efforts to compete with Wall Street bonuses are what's driving M&amp;amp;A lawyers' salaries in New York and the Bay Area.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Glenn Kelman, CEO, Redfin&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Glenn Kelman</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 05 May 2007 23:04:29 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Valley in merger fever: Google looks at SimplyHired? | VentureBeat</title><link>http://venturebeat.com/2007/05/04/valley-in-merger-fever-google-looks-at-simplyhired/#comment-14674745</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Makes sense.  People will always be interested in jobs and Google will always be interested in new content with which to present ads.  Heck, it makes more sense than the YouTube purchase.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;GJ&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Gal Josefsberg</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 05 May 2007 18:52:17 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Valley in merger fever: Google looks at SimplyHired? | VentureBeat</title><link>http://venturebeat.com/2007/05/04/valley-in-merger-fever-google-looks-at-simplyhired/#comment-14674744</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Unless there is a very large backlog of deals that haven't been announced but have actually closed, I think the M&amp;amp;A rumor mill is wildly outpacing the actual number of closed transactions. Without a viable IPO market for most of these companies, M&amp;amp;A is the only way most of these companies will achieve liquidity. There's no harm in speculating and deals can fall apart at the last minute, but I think a lot of the M&amp;amp;A hype is wishful thinking as opposed to reflective of real substantive conversations.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Charles</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 05 May 2007 02:56:25 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>