<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title>VentureBeat - Latest Comments in Web-hosting service Rackspace files for IPO</title><link>http://venturebeat.disqus.com/</link><description>News about Tech, Business and Innovation</description><atom:link href="https://venturebeat.disqus.com/web_hosting_service_rackspace_files_for_ipo/latest.rss" rel="self"></atom:link><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Mon, 01 Mar 2010 05:31:43 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: Web-hosting service Rackspace files for IPO</title><link>http://venturebeat.com/2008/04/27/rackspace-files-for-ipo/#comment-37437387</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Sure, the promise of cost savings, “fair” usage-based billing and unlimited scalability are appealing, but before you make the jump, a background check is in order.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">chaney</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 01 Mar 2010 05:31:43 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Web-hosting service Rackspace files for IPO</title><link>http://venturebeat.com/2008/04/27/rackspace-files-for-ipo/#comment-14685296</link><description>&lt;p&gt;400 million is about what I paid for my services at rackspace when I hosted my servers their. Nickel and Dime me everytime I need support. Moved over to server intellect where I can get some support without paying 400 million per incident.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">micheal</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 12 Jun 2008 16:33:25 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Web-hosting service Rackspace files for IPO</title><link>http://venturebeat.com/2008/04/27/rackspace-files-for-ipo/#comment-14685295</link><description>&lt;p&gt;F.Y.I.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Milton Schwartz</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 04 May 2008 20:46:15 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>