<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title>VentureBeat - Latest Comments in With revenue and new services, WeatherBill predicts bright future in weather insurance</title><link>http://venturebeat.disqus.com/</link><description>News about Tech, Business and Innovation</description><atom:link href="https://venturebeat.disqus.com/with_revenue_and_new_services_weatherbill_predicts_bright_future_in_weather_insurance/latest.rss" rel="self"></atom:link><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Wed, 01 Apr 2009 07:55:29 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: With revenue and new services, WeatherBill predicts bright future in weather insurance</title><link>http://venturebeat.com/2009/03/30/with-revenue-and-new-services-weatherbill-predicts-bright-future-in-weather-insurance/#comment-7711328</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Keep in mind that this is not weather insurance.  WeatherBill offers weather DERIVATIVES.  A weather derivative transaction can only take place between two eligilbe parties, primarily defined as haveing at least $1,000,000 in net worth or $10,000,000 in assets.  WeatherBill actually runs the transaction through a third party in Bermuda.  Derivatives are virtually unregulated, while insurance is highly regulated.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Unless you know what you are doing, it can be a risky venture.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">weather_tradedr</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 01 Apr 2009 07:55:29 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: With revenue and new services, WeatherBill predicts bright future in weather insurance</title><link>http://venturebeat.com/2009/03/30/with-revenue-and-new-services-weatherbill-predicts-bright-future-in-weather-insurance/#comment-7652222</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Re: weather contracts for 2008 in the Weather Risk Management Association/PricewaterhouseCoopers Industry Survey, more winter contracts were done than summer contracts.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Shirley Savage  </dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 30 Mar 2009 21:22:31 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: With revenue and new services, WeatherBill predicts bright future in weather insurance</title><link>http://venturebeat.com/2009/03/30/with-revenue-and-new-services-weatherbill-predicts-bright-future-in-weather-insurance/#comment-7650418</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Thanks for asking about that. In this case I mean revenue, not any form of profit.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Eric Rosser Eldon</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 30 Mar 2009 20:20:18 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: With revenue and new services, WeatherBill predicts bright future in weather insurance</title><link>http://venturebeat.com/2009/03/30/with-revenue-and-new-services-weatherbill-predicts-bright-future-in-weather-insurance/#comment-7649933</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Interesting business.  One general comment/critique of this and other posts I see on this site: please try to better define "making x dollars".  Does that mean in revenue, gross profit, operating profit, or some other unit such as in this case potentially the value of the insurance contracts.  I know private companies are cagey about these numbers and there is no way to verify them, but it would be nice to better understand at least what they are claiming.  I don't mean to be too critical, overall a very informative post about a company I hadn't heard from in a while.  &lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Dan</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 30 Mar 2009 20:00:59 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>