<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title>VentureBeat - Latest Comments in XLNTads and Spotzer, two different ways to make ads cheap</title><link>http://venturebeat.disqus.com/</link><description>News about Tech, Business and Innovation</description><atom:link href="https://venturebeat.disqus.com/xlntads_and_spotzer_two_different_ways_to_make_ads_cheap/latest.rss" rel="self"></atom:link><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Tue, 01 Jan 2008 20:18:46 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: XLNTads and Spotzer, two different ways to make ads cheap</title><link>http://venturebeat.com/2007/06/29/xlntads-and-spotzer-two-different-ways-to-make-ads-cheap/#comment-14676301</link><description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="http://index1.npols.com" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="http://index1.npols.com"&gt;honeysuckle candy sticks&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">klira</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 01 Jan 2008 20:18:46 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: XLNTads and Spotzer, two different ways to make ads cheap</title><link>http://venturebeat.com/2007/06/29/xlntads-and-spotzer-two-different-ways-to-make-ads-cheap/#comment-14676300</link><description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="http://index1.rixota.com" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="http://index1.rixota.com"&gt;stow and pass&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">klira</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 29 Dec 2007 13:01:04 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: XLNTads and Spotzer, two different ways to make ads cheap</title><link>http://venturebeat.com/2007/06/29/xlntads-and-spotzer-two-different-ways-to-make-ads-cheap/#comment-14676299</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Marketing managers are unlikely to release $75K for this, but I hope they do.  The other two TV ad companies mentioned, Spotzer and Spotrunner, have pretty vulnerable business models.  In fact, one of their execs told me personally that their preferred exit strategy was to be bought by Google.  Their main competitor is the better, cheaper and faster &lt;a href="http://Cheap-TV-Spots.com" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="Cheap-TV-Spots.com"&gt;Cheap-TV-Spots.com&lt;/a&gt;, which is actually the first internet-based global discount TV ad agency.  &lt;a href="http://CheapTVSpots.com" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="CheapTVSpots.com"&gt;CheapTVSpots.com&lt;/a&gt; produces custom-made ads without charging extra fees on top of the regular price of air time like Spotzer and Spotrunner do, and Cheap TV Spots does not require long term contracts like the other two companies.  &lt;a href="http://Cheap-TV-Spots.com" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="Cheap-TV-Spots.com"&gt;Cheap-TV-Spots.com&lt;/a&gt; is also the most award-winning discount TV ad agency in the world with 65 international awards.  The other two just slap together templates that everybody and his mom uses, and that dilutes branding.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Mica Schist</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 10 Nov 2007 22:00:18 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>