<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title>VentureBeat - Latest Comments in Zantaz&amp;#8217;s $375M payday, and its unfortunate back-story</title><link>http://venturebeat.disqus.com/</link><description>News about Tech, Business and Innovation</description><atom:link href="https://venturebeat.disqus.com/zantaz8217s_375m_payday_and_its_unfortunate_back_story/latest.rss" rel="self"></atom:link><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Aug 2007 09:38:24 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: Zantaz&amp;#8217;s $375M payday, and its unfortunate back-story</title><link>http://venturebeat.com/2007/07/06/zantazs-375m-payday-and-the-unfortunate-back-story/#comment-14676454</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Very useful and informative blog. Recommended for all to see. &lt;br&gt;&lt;a href="http://medsdrugs.blogspot.com/" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="http://medsdrugs.blogspot.com/"&gt;http://medsdrugs.blogspot.com/&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">accillainjurb</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 10 Aug 2007 09:38:24 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Zantaz&amp;#8217;s $375M payday, and its unfortunate back-story</title><link>http://venturebeat.com/2007/07/06/zantazs-375m-payday-and-the-unfortunate-back-story/#comment-14676453</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Hello! Good Site! Thanks you! exmiyxgefelsnp&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">tqmbvqoaao</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 31 Jul 2007 15:12:50 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Zantaz&amp;#8217;s $375M payday, and its unfortunate back-story</title><link>http://venturebeat.com/2007/07/06/zantazs-375m-payday-and-the-unfortunate-back-story/#comment-14676452</link><description>&lt;p&gt;This what happens when you deal with second tier vcs who will do anything when they are desperate as comm ventures is now.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Bob</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 09 Jul 2007 17:02:21 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Zantaz&amp;#8217;s $375M payday, and its unfortunate back-story</title><link>http://venturebeat.com/2007/07/06/zantazs-375m-payday-and-the-unfortunate-back-story/#comment-14676451</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Some interesting stuff, least they got their payday&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Charles</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 09 Jul 2007 16:55:29 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Zantaz&amp;#8217;s $375M payday, and its unfortunate back-story</title><link>http://venturebeat.com/2007/07/06/zantazs-375m-payday-and-the-unfortunate-back-story/#comment-14676449</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Talk about dirty laundry!&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Well, things WERE different in 2002 then they were in 2000 and as they are in 2007. Look at the upticks and down rounds of deals done in 2002 and compare it with the deal here - looks pretty normal.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Also the founder here seems to have sold a part of his holdings "for living expenses and to finance another venture". Presumably the other ventures didn't pan out and this one did. He spread his risks and guess what, when you "diversify" your returns get lower.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;I don't know any of these people, except to sympathize and empathize with them because I have been there. &lt;br&gt;I kid that I have been on all six sides of the table; as a founder, as an investor, as the lead negotiator, as the counsel to previous investors, as a representative of the employees and as the due diligence lawyer facilitating the process. I wouldn't say that I have seen it all, but I have seen enough.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;I did snicker at ComVentures, when Sequoia sued them for copying their website - that was so funny! Hopefully with extra $375M (minus .6M for the founder) they can hire a good web designer.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Sunny Kalara</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 09 Jul 2007 07:12:37 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Zantaz&amp;#8217;s $375M payday, and its unfortunate back-story</title><link>http://venturebeat.com/2007/07/06/zantazs-375m-payday-and-the-unfortunate-back-story/#comment-14676448</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I was an executive at several companies funded by ComVentures and Worldview and remain unsurprised at the way things turned out at Zantaz.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Entrepreneurs would do well to explore every other firms/investors as their financial partners in building their company before considering certain venture firms and partners named below. There is enough hard work in building a company and you don't want crises, especially ones that are artificially inflated or even created, to be used against you to wipe out you and other shareholders, esp those that took the risk and put in the early hard work.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;ComVentures/van der Meer, Crescendo/Spreng, Worldview/Orsak and Wei have similar operating approaches as reflected in the cases of Zantaz, Nishan, Force 10 and other Worldview deals.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;For every Zantaz shareholder, I'd encourage you to join in the suit against the Zantaz directors as that's the only way you'd get some money for the value you built. Go, Mr Niesar, and go Zantaz shareholders, rage against the ComVentures and their kind.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">OnComVentures</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 06 Jul 2007 17:10:11 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>